In most low-dropout regulators (LDOs), current flow is like one-way street – go in the wrong direction and major problems can occur! Reverse current is current that flows from VOUT to VIN instead of from VIN to VOUT. This current usually traverses through the body diode of the LDO instead of the normal conducting channel, and has the potential to cause long-term reliability problems or even destroy the device.
There are three main components to an LDO (see Figure 1): the bandgap reference, error amplifier and pass field-effect transistor (FET). The pass FET conducts current, as any normal FET, between the source and the drain in a typical application. The doped region used to create the body of the FET, called the bulk, is tied to the source; this reduces the amount of threshold voltage change.
Figure 1: LDO functional block diagram
One drawback of tying the bulk together with the source is that a parasitic body diode forms in the FET, as shown in Figure 2. This parasitic diode is called the body diode. In this configuration, the body diode can turn on when the output exceeds the input voltage plus the VFB of the parasitic diode. Reverse current flow through this diode can cause device damage through device heating, electromigration or latch-up events.
Figure 2: Cross-sectional view of a p-channel metal-oxide semiconductor (PMOS) FET
When designing your LDO, it is important to consider reverse current and how to prevent it. In this post, I’ll cover two ways of preventing reverse current at the application level and two ways during the integrated circuit (IC) design process.
There are four common methods for preventing reverse current flow, two at the application level and two during design.
Use a Schottky diode
As shown in Figure 3, using a Schottky diode from OUT to IN will keep the body diode in the LDO from conducting when the output voltage exceeds the input voltage. You must use Schottky diodes because of their low forward voltage. Traditional diodes have a much higher forward voltage than Schottky diodes. During normal operation, the Schottky diode is reverse-biased and will not conduct any current. Another advantage of this approach is that the LDO’s dropout voltage will not increase when placing a Schottky diode between the output and the input.
Figure 3: Preventing reverse current using a Schottky diode
Use a diode before the LDO
As shown in Figure 4, this method uses a diode in front of the LDO to prevent current from flowing back into the supply. This is an effective method at preventing reverse current, but it also increases the necessary input voltage needed to keep the LDO out of dropout. The diode placed at the supply of the LDO becomes reverse-biased during a reverse current condition and does not allow any current to flow. This method is similar to the next method.
Figure 4: Reverse current prevention using a diode before the LDO
Use a second FET
LDOs designed to block reverse current flow often use a second FET to help prevent reverse current flow. The two FETs are placed with the sources back to back, as shown in Figure 5, so that the body diodes face each other. Now, when a reverse current condition is detected, one of the transistors will turn off and current cannot flow through the back-to-back diodes.
One of the biggest drawbacks to this approach is that the dropout voltage essentially doubles when using this architecture. To decrease the dropout voltage, you will have to increase the size of the metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs), thus increasing the overall solution size. Automotive LDOs like TI’s TPS7B7702-Q1 use this approach to prevent reverse current flow.
Figure 5: Back-to-back FETs to prevent reverse current
Connect the bulk of the MOSFET to GND
This method is the least common way of implementing reverse current but is still extremely effective, as it eliminates the body diode of the MOSFET. This method ties the bulk of the MOSFET to GND, eliminating the connection to the source that was causing the parasitic body diode. TI’s TPS7A37 uses this method to implement reverse current protection. One advantage is that tying the bulk of the MOSFET to GND does not increase the dropout of the LDO.
Figure 6: Connecting the bulk of the FET to GND
When reverse current protection is needed in your application look for the LDO topologies that provide the level needed. If an LDO with reverse current protection does not meet all the system requirements, consider implementing reverse current protection using a diode.
Use of Schottky diode in the input line before the LDO is understood . We have done this on the output line after the LDO in one of our design
But the use of Schottky connected from Out to in is not clear . Seems like the current will flow from output to input through the Schottky diode .
The use of a Schottky from Out to In is more for protection of the LDO and not protection of the system. This LDO will prevent the LDO from experiencing reverse current as it will flow through the diode, but it will not protect the input of the system. I think we should have made that more clear in this blog.
A good refresher of the basics of LDO on reverse current flow.
I have a query regarding the last point if by shorting BULK to gnd prevents reverse current flow then why we are not doing in every LDO?
Is there a drawback or disadvantage in doing that?
Suggestions for next version of the article - give a little more information to help us understand the magnitude of the problems and proposed solutions. Here are comments for the 4 proposed solutions:
1. "Traditional diodes have a much higher forward voltage than Schottky diodes." Does this really matter? We all know the general .3V and .7V numbers, but what are the voltage drops at the expected currents?
2. Do we need to worry about the transient/surge current (through the LDO) required to charge the input capacitor, or are we solving a long-term power problem?
3. "One of the biggest drawbacks to this approach is that the dropout voltage essentially doubles when using this architecture." This may be true in some instances, but how much voltage are we talking about? Most times, my LDO needs don't require worrying about tenths of a volt.
4. " This method ties the bulk of the MOSFET to GND, eliminating the connection to the source that was causing the parasitic body diode." I need some more details (another cross-sectional view?) to understand this solution and possible drawbacks (like Harmeet's question).
Thanks for reading! The reason that the bulk is not always connected to GND is that the bulk to source voltage helps to determine the threshold voltage of the FET. Generally we want the smallest possible threshold voltage and if this is not connected to the source we would have to deal with the body effect (back gate effect) caused by not tying this to the source.
This article misses the point for me. I want to use the LDO to charge a battery (DblLayerCap) when external power is available, and not load Vout otherwise. Devices from (some) other vendors spec (and test) reverse current accordingly. Tying the resistive voltage divider across Vout is a problem area.
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.