This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

LMH6612 of overload recovery

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMH6612, LMH6611, OPA857

Dear Specialists

My customer has a question for LMH6612.

Could you please let me know.

He wants to know about the phenomenon at overload.
When the input voltage is higher, the output is satulated.
(For example the gain is 10, it is easy to satulate.)

(1)If the output is satulated, how does the amplifier work?
For instance, only THD increase or polality change or another.
 
(2)How long is the overload recovery?
It is not described at datasheet.

Best regards,

  • Hello,

    I'll try to answer your questions below:

    1. Output Saturation: The device output can rail against positive or negative rails. The only possibility is that when this happens, the supply current may increase a little bit. But, when input conditions go back to normal, the output will recover. When output is saturated or close to saturation, Harmonic Distortion will degrade significantly. There will not be any output phase reversal with output saturation (output will rail and stay flat as long as input is large enough to keep output saturated).

    2. Overload Recovery Time: Unfortunately, I don't have any data on that to share. If it is important enough, please let us know and we can order samples and take the data on a couple of units.

    Regards,

    Hooman

  • Dear Hooman

    Thank you for you reply.

    Question 1. is OK. The customer is understood.

    About Overload Recovery Time, he wants to know actual value. Because it is quite impotant for the system specification.

    It is required less than 100ns.

    Could you conrifm the spec.

    And dead line is 11 April. I'm sorry for the rush. The customer doesn't any time. If the schedule is a problem, let me know the due date.

    If the spec is OK, they continue to consider to adopt.

    Thank you very much for your cooperation and patient.

    Best regards,

  • Hello Shinichi,

    I've obtained samples and EVM for the LMH6612 and I will try and measure output overload recovery tomorrow and then report it back by tomorrow.

    Regards,

    Hooman

  • Dear Hooman san

    Thank you for you  reply.

    I appreciate your great help.

    I'll be waiting for the data. 

    Best regards,

    Shinichi

     

     

  • Hello Shinich-san,

    Sorry, I did not get the chance to get you the LMH6612 overload recovery measurement I had promised. I will get it to you by tomorrow Friday.

    Regards,

    Hooman

  • Dear Hooman san

    Thank you for your reply.

    That's OK. I can wait.

     If you finish the measurement, could you please send me.

    Best regards,

    Shinichi

  • Hello Shinichi-san,

    I have measured the LMH6611 / LMH6612 output overload recovery time that we've been discussing.

    Condition

    Baseline Prop.

    Delay

    (ns)

    Measured input / output

    zero-crossing Delta

    (ns)

    Overload Recovery

    Time

    (ns)

    Pos. to Neg. transition

    (Vout railed at Vcc)

    16

    18

    2

    (=18-16)

    Neg. to Pos. transition

    (Vout railed at Vee)

    16

    26

    10

    (=26-16)

    Here is the measured overloaded recovery waveform for your reference (there is a baseline 16ns zero-crossing delta between input and output which needs to be subtracted out):

    In addition, I've also measured the LMH6611 / LMH6612 supply current / channel (I+ from Vcc, and I- from Vee) when the output is railed against Vcc or Vee, for your review:

    Condition

    Both Channels Supply Current

    Measured (only one channel saturated!)

    I+ (mA)

    I- (mA)

    No Signal

    7

    7

    Saturated towards V+

    16

    13

    Saturated towards V-

    12

    14

    Supply current / channel

    in V+ saturation

    12.5

    (=16-7/2)

    9.5 

    (=13-7/2)

    Supply current / channel

    in V- saturation

    8.5

    (=12-7/2)

    10.5

    (=14-7/2)

    Regards,

    Hooman

  • Dear Hooman

    Thank you for your reply.

    I'll feedback to the customer.

    I appreciate your quick response and great help.

    Best regards,

    Shinichi

  • Dear Hooman

    I sent the data to the customer. 

    And he has an additional question, could you please advise.

    About the overload recovery time, what is the worst value?

    If possible, can I get the data room remp and over temp.

    He have to estimate the worst case response time,  it is needed.

    I appreciate your great help.

    Best regards,

    Shinichi

  • Hello Shinichi-san,

    I'm sorry but I was out of office all of last week and I'm just catching up with everything.

    I can make some LMH6612 overload recovery time measurements over temperature by Thursday on a couple of units. I don't have a good way to estimate the worst case over temperature.

    However, since you originally needed ~100ns and we are measuring 10ns or less, chances are you have a safe margin (assuming it does not get much worse over temperature when I take the data). Do you agree?

     

    Regards,

    Hooman

  • Dear Hooman

    Thank you for your reply.

    I understand the situation.

    But I think 100ns is 10 times larger than measurement value (less than 10ns).

    I  worry about the customer doesn't  accept it

    He wants more accurate value.

    Could you please advise by adding a general information of amplifier deviation.

    I am happy  maximum value is less than few times.

    Best regards,  

  • Hi Shinichi-san,

    Unfortunately I won't be able to complete the LMH6612 overload recovery over temperature by tomorrow as I had promised. It would have to be postponed to early next week which I hope is ok.

    I think we better wait for the over temperature testing results to see what the amount of change before making any judgments on whether or not we would be able to make sure we can meet the 100ns requirement.

    Regards,

    Hooman

  • Dear Hooman

    Thank you for your reply.

    That's OK, I can wait.

    About worstcase value, could you please advise after the measurement.

    Best regards,

    Shinichi

     

  • Hello Shinichi-san,

    I've measured the LMH6612 (LMH6611) overload recovery time over temperature (HOT= 95C, COLD= -45C) and I hardly see any change from room temperature and for all conditions read less than 10ns! So, this is pretty good news.

    Condition

    Baseline Prop.

    Delay

    (ns)

    Measured input / output

    zero-crossing Delta

    (ns)

    Overload Recovery

    Time

    (ns)

    Pos. to Neg. transition

    (Vout railed at Vcc)

    HOT

    14

    18

    4

    (=18-14)

    Neg. to Pos. transition

    (Vout railed at Vee)

    HOT

    16

    24

    8

    (=24-16)

    Condition

    Baseline Prop.

    Delay

    (ns)

    Measured input / output

    zero-crossing Delta

    (ns)

    Overload Recovery

    Time

    (ns)

    Pos. to Neg. transition

    (Vout railed at Vcc)

    COLD

    14

    20

    6

    (=20-14)

    Neg. to Pos. transition

    (Vout railed at Vee)

    COLD

    16

    24

    8

    (=24-16)

    Here is the data if you like to see the plots:

    HOT:

    COLD:

    Regards,

    Hooman

  • Dear Hooman

    Thank you for your reply.

    Yes, it's a good news!

    I' ll feedback to the customer.

    How much should I estimate the max value (concern about individual difference)

    Best regards,

    Shinichi 

  • Hi Shinichi-san,

    I don't think I have the expertise to estimate a maximum value on overload recovery. I've put this request to the LMH6612 designer to see if he has any ideas on it. If I hear back from him, I will keep you posted.

    It may be worthwhile to recommend that your customer try a handful of the LMH6612 in his application as my preliminary testing showed less than 10ns recovery time and his requirements were 100ns. So, there is a good chance that the LMH6612 meets his needs.

    Regards,

    Hooman

  • Here is what I got back from the LMH6612 designer:

    "From your overload recovery time over temperature of less than 10ns, I would expect the overload recovery time should be less than 2X  or 20ns. However, it’s only an educated guess not a guarantee."

    Regards,

    Hooman

  • Dear Hooman

    Thank you for your reply and confirmation.

    I think it's a best answer.

    I hope this question will close.

    Could you please for a while.

    Best regards,

    Shinichi

  • Dear Hooman

    I appreciate your great help.

    I was discussed with the customer.

    It is a good data of large signal response.

    But he wants to know recovery time from satulation(V+ and V-). Could you please see attached file.

    Also, he has following 2 questions.

    Could you please respond.

    (1) He wants to know THD VS. Output Swing at  V+3.3V, V-0V, AV=10

    The datasheet(Figure 26 and Figure27) says different condition.

    Do you have any suggestions?

    His request is AV=-10,V+=3.3V,V-=0V

    Vin:5mV,50mV,300mV

    Could you please see attached file.

    (2) input bias current drift

    Do you have any suggestions?

    Best regards,

    Shinichi

    2084.LMH6612 of example of overload recovery and THD.ppt

  • Hi Shinichi,

    1. Overdrive recovery: I can capture waveforms of the LMH6612 output banging against V+ and V- and how it recovers, as you have shown in your PowerPoint, by next week. However, I will leave it to you to interpret the recovery time from that, because to me, I'm not sure how you would read recovery time off the waveform you are asking for!

    Here is the OPA857 that you have noted is specified (and I'm not sure if Figure 13 is showing the same thing or not?

    OPA857 Recovery:

    2. THD with Av=-10V/V, Vs= 3.3V at various output swings (RL= 1kohm): I don't expect much variation up to 2Vpp output swing, from Vs=5V to Vs=3.3V as the distortion data in the Electrical tables shows very little variation:

    There will be some distortion increase with Av= -10V/V relative to Av= 2V/V or Av= -1V/V (these two last gains would be very similar to each other from the loop gain point of view and most likely distortion).

    I don't have the exact data you are looking for right now. I've asked around to see if we have some information to share or not? If I cannot get this information, I'd have to defer it to your own / customer evaluation instead as my work load would not allow me to take this data immediately. Sorry about that.

    3. Input Bias Current Drift over temperature: Unfortunately, apart from Figure 41 shown below, more data is not available!

    What you can deduce from Figure 41, for a typical device, is that worst case IB (I_bias) is most likely at cold temperature. Current is always negative (meaning out of the LMH6612 input pins.

    The input bias current is guaranteed to be less than -11.1uA over temperature, but I don't have any additional data to say how it varies with temperature on individual devices:

    Regards,

    Hooman

  • Dear Hooman

    Thank you for your reply.

    1.  Thank you for your measurement.
    I look forward to the data.

    About Figure.13 and the electrical spec of overload recovery time at OPA857,
    It is a same thing.
    Could you please be aware that time domein of the waveform is too wide.((250ns/div)
    It must be expanded for measure the value of overload recovery time.(15ns)

    2.  You mentioned the difference of THD between Av=-10 and AV=2 or -1, it may be similar.
    Could you please mention how is the difference.
    The customer wants to know simply. for instance 2times/10times/100times.
    It can be roughly OK.

    3. I understand that there isn't temperature drift spec.
    I'll send your suggestion of Figure 41.

    Best regards,

    Shinichi

  • Hello Shinichi,

    Regarding the LMH6612 waveform after banging into the rails:

    1. Overdrive Recovery:

    The plots I sent you earlier already show these waveforms. I've taken the previous plots (HOT temperature in this case) and zoomed in on these regions below. Room temp and COLD look very similar.

    Rising:

    Falling:

    2. THD with Av=-10V/V, Vs= 3.3V at various output swings (RL= 1kohm):


    Unfortunately I could not locate any useful data to share and you may have to do the testing yourself. You generally expect higher closed loop gain and lower supply voltages to affect distortion negatively (worsens), but I'm not sure I could put a number on it.

    Regards,

    Hooman

  • Dear Hooman 

    Thank you for your reply.

    I appreciate your great help.

    1. your data of overload recovery, this is not saturated.

    The customer wants a data of  recovery time from saturation like OPA857.

    He is  thinking the value is different.

    If the value is same , it's OK

    Could you please comment. 

    2.  I understand the situation .

    I'll feedback to the customer.

    Best regards,

    Shinichi 

  • Hi Shinichi,

    All the plots I've been showing on this topic so far, including the ones from yesterday, are with a large enough input such that the output is railed against both sides and then recovers from it. Note that the LMH6612 output can only get to within 100's of mV of either supply rail even at maximum swing / saturated output.

    Regards,

    Hooman

  • Dear Hooman,

    Thank you for your reply. 

    I'm sorry for responding late. 

    I checked these files.

    Output swings are around 2.5V and -2.5V. 

    On the other hand, Vs=+/-5V.

    I think it couldn't be saturated.

    How do I think of these, because +/-2.5V is a half of +/-5V.

    Could it be that is a slip of the pen?

    Could you please advise.

    Best regards,

    Shinichi

  • Hi Shinichi,

    The plots I've supplied were tested with 50ohm output series resistance then plugged into a scope with 50ohm termination (I have mentioned this as "RL=50+50" in the notes below them). So, the scope waveforms are 6dB less than the voltage at device output. That's why you see 2.5V instead of 5V swing.

    Regards,

    Hooman

  • Dear Hooman 

    Thank you for your reply.

    Now, I see what you're saying.All of the data is saturated.

    I'm sorry for my misunderstanding.

    And then I'll feedback to the customer.

    I appreciate your great help.

    Best regards,

    Shinichi