• Join
  • Sign In with my.TI Login
Texas Instruments
  • Products
  • Applications
  • Tools & Software
  • Support & Community
  • Sample & Buy
  • About TI
Sample & Purchase Cart Sample & Purchase Cart
  • Search
  • Advanced
TI E2E™ Community
  • Support Forums
  • Blogs
  • Groups
  • Videos
  • 简体中文
  • More ...
TI Home » TI E2E Community » Support Forums » Amplifiers » Precision Amplifiers » Precision Amplifiers Forum » Need recommendation for Op-Amp with better PSRR
Share
Precision Amplifiers
  • Forum
  • Announcements
  • E2E Wiki
Options
  • Subscribe via RSS
Check out
The Signal blog
  • $core_v2_blog.Current.Name

    Grounding Principles

    Posted 3 days ago
    by Bruce Trump
    In a previous blog on supply bypassing , I cautioned that poor...
  • $core_v2_blog.Current.Name

    Handy Gadgets and Resistor Divider Calculations

    Posted 10 days ago
    by Bruce Trump
    Handy gadgets make our engineering life easier—the little...
  • $core_v2_blog.Current.Name

    Chopper Op Amps—are they really noisy?

    Posted 18 days ago
    by Bruce Trump
    Chopper op amps offer very low offset voltage and dramatically...

Need recommendation for Op-Amp with better PSRR

Need recommendation for Op-Amp with better PSRR

This question is not answered
Anthony Rolando
Posted by Anthony Rolando
on Mar 15 2012 14:50 PM
Prodigy90 points

Hello, I am in need of an dual op amp that has a good Power Supply Rejection Ration (PSRR). A slow op amp is fine. Right now I am using a LM358, and the problem I am having is that a best case scenario the LM358 works good, but several of the LM358 do not. The data sheet shows the spec as Typical 100db and Minimum of 60db for LM358.

Does anybody have a suggestion for something I could drop i place of the LM358 that might have better rejection?

Thanx,

Tony Rolando
Make Noise
http://www.makenoisemusic.com

Report Abuse
  • Reply
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
All Replies
  • John Caldwell
    Posted by John Caldwell
    on Mar 15 2012 14:56 PM
    Expert6535 points

    Hi Anthony,

    Because power supply rejection ratio rolls-off as frequency increases, the specification given in the data tables of a datasheet is really a "best case" scenario. To really narrow down a suitable opamp, it would be helpful if we knew what the frequency content of the noise in your power supply is, as well as what level this noise needs to be reduced to. For example, if this noise is coming from a switching power supply, what is the frequency that this supply is running at and what is the magnitude of the output ripple.

    It is also possible that for very high frequency noise, no opamp will have adequate PSRR to reduce the noise to acceptable levels, in which case you would need to add some additional regulation to your power supply rails.

    John Caldwell

    Analog Applications Engineer

    PA Linear Apps

    Report Abuse
    • Reply
    You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
  • Anthony Rolando
    Posted by Anthony Rolando
    on Mar 15 2012 15:38 PM
    Prodigy90 points

    Hello, thanx for the response.

    The noise is from an variable frequency oscillator circuit on the same board, frequency range is variable from 1 hz to 10khz. The noise on the supply lines is from this oscillator circuit. The rest of the circuits on the board are fine. The supply lines are bypassed at each op-amp on the board. The supply lines are regulated well. I believe the problem is actually because of the circuit now that I think about it... I am using the LM358 to buffer a +10V Zener reference. The LM358 is running from +/-12V supply, so the +10V reference is probably saturating the LM358. If I set the zener ref to 8V, I no longer have the power supply rejection problems, the buffered 8V ref is clean enough. I suppose I might benefit from a Rail to Rail Op-Amp?

    T

    Report Abuse
    • Reply
    You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
  • Victor Ceron
    Posted by Victor Ceron
    on Mar 15 2012 16:40 PM
    Prodigy430 points

    Have you thought about using a Linear Regulator to filter the noise coming from your power supply?

    Most operational amplifiers spec PSRR at DC.

    PSRR over frequency, in most cases, is only simulated or omitted because most of the time opamps can't effectively filter noise coming from the power line. What many signal chain customers had used in this cases is a high PSRR/ low Noise, high voltage LDO like TPS7A4901DGN (positive voltage) and TPS7A3001DGN (negative voltage).

    Report Abuse
    • Reply
    You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
  • John Caldwell
    Posted by John Caldwell
    on Mar 15 2012 16:48 PM
    Expert6535 points

    Well, to start one possible culprit for this noise is the zener itself. Although we think of them as nearly ideal voltage sources (zero DC resistance) they do have a resistance associated with them, typically called the zener resistance. This resistance can be surprisingly high for higher voltage zeners and is also dependent upon the bias current of the zener. For instance, assuming the zener is being reverse biased by a 1k resistor to the positive supply, and has a zener resistance of 10 ohms, then the noise from the power supply would be reduced by 10/(1k+10) = .0099 or -40dB as opposed to the >60dB reduction in noise from the opamps power supplies. For lower bias resistor values this will be worse. Two possible solutions are to place a capacitor in parallel with your zener and, even better, bias your zener with a current source.

    I would disagree that PSRR over frequency is omitted from datasheets because opamps can't filter noise on their power lines. Most new opamps feature this curve in the datasheets as it is considered a standard datasheet characterization, however this hasn't always been true and older parts may neglect the data.

    John Caldwell

    Analog Applications Engineer

    PA Linear Apps

    Report Abuse
    • Reply
    You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
  • Anthony Rolando
    Posted by Anthony Rolando
    on Mar 15 2012 17:10 PM
    Prodigy90 points

    Yeah, I've considered using a Linear regulator, but since I need +/- Ref voltage at only about 5mA, I figured I'd try using an op-amp and zener, that way I get both ref. voltages, buffered at a cost that is less then half that of just the TPS7A4901DGN (I'd need the TPS7A3001DGN). Not to mention I already have the LM358 in the BOM, so it is fewer parts to source.

    Thanx for the tips though, I will keep those TPS7A3001DGN parts in mind for future designs.

    T

    Report Abuse
    • Reply
    You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
  • Anthony Rolando
    Posted by Anthony Rolando
    on Mar 15 2012 17:28 PM
    Prodigy90 points

    John, the Zener Ref. circuit looking into the non-inverting pin of the op-amp buffer is OK. The Supply noise is sufficiently filtered out the RC circuit formed by the current limiting resistor feeding the zener and a 1uF and .1uF cap in parallel with the zener.

    Report Abuse
    • Reply
    You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
  • MikkoS
    Posted by MikkoS
    on Mar 17 2012 09:05 AM
    Prodigy40 points

    Check the output voltage swing from the datasheet, LM358 cannot swing close enough to the positive rail to 

    buffer +10V from a +12V power supply. The datasheet states that you can get +26V (to 2kOhm load) from +30V supply, so

    which about matches getting 8V from 12V supply.

    Use a rail-to-rail opamp or an amplifier that can go closer to the positive rail.

    Report Abuse
    • Reply
    You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
  • John Caldwell
    Posted by John Caldwell
    on Mar 19 2012 11:18 AM
    Expert6535 points

    Anthony,

    Before you try a different opamp, you may want to consider using a lower voltage zener diode and applying gain using the opamp. I believe what is happening is that the high input voltage (in relation to the positive supply) is not allowing sufficient voltage drop across the internal current sources of the opamp to allow them to properly reject power supply noise. Using a lower voltage zener (e.g. 5.6V) and configuring the opamp for a gain of 1.79 will still give a 10V output, but may allow the opamp to provide better PSRR and CMRR.

    Definitely something to try before switching to a more expensive opamp!

    John Caldwell

    Analog Applications Engineer

    PA Linear Apps

    Report Abuse
    • Reply
    You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
TI E2E™ Community
  • Support Forums
  • Blogs
  • Videos
  • Groups
  • Site Support & Feedback
  • Settings
TI E2E™ Community Groups
  • TI University Program
  • Make the Switch
  • Microcontroller Projects
  • Motor Drive & Control
Other Communities
  • Deyisupport
  • Designsomething.org
  • beagleboard.org
  • TI on Element 14
  • TI on TechXchangeSM
Other Technical & Support Resources
  • WEBENCH® Design Center
  • Product Information Centers
  • Technical Documents
  • TI Design Network
  • TI Technical Articles
  • TI Training

All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with respect to these materials. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.

Content on this site may contain or be subject to specific guidelines or limitations on use. All postings and use of the content on this site are subject to the Terms of Use of the site; third parties using this content agree to abide by any limitations or guidelines and to comply with the Terms of Use of this site. TI, its suppliers and providers of content reserve the right to make corrections, deletions, modifications, enhancements, improvements and other changes to the content and materials, its products, programs and services at any time or to move or discontinue any content, products, programs, or services without notice.

Follow Us Texas Instruments on Facebook Texas Instruments on Twitter Texas Instruments on LinkedIn Texas Instruments on Google+
TI Worldwide | Contact Us | my.TI Login | Site Map | Corporate Citizenship | mobile m.ti.com (Mobile Version)

TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs and
embedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.

© Copyright 1995-2013 Texas Instruments Incorporated. All rights reserved.
Trademarks | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use