This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

PCM4202: PCM4202 input characteristics

Part Number: PCM4202
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: THS4551, , THS4131, OPA1632

Morning, 

I was scanning Audio ADC's specs for example parts to drive from a 50kHz measurement mic, scanning for input spec - this looks like an error, should be Input probably, Are there CM input tolerance specs on this, or other more recent, Audio ADC's - can you point to an example? 

  •  Michael, 

    You are correct. This is a typo, it should read "Analog Inputs"

    Regarding the Common-mode rejection,  There is no min/max spec,  only typical. This is pretty standard for just about all of our ADCs as well as those of our competitors.

    best regards,

    -Steve Wilson

  • Thanks Steve, 

    I was actually asking if there was a spec on the allowed variation of DC input common mode voltage to the ADC - I think a lot of these (but not all) audio ADC's have internal references to use which I then intend to apply to the CM control of an FDA - those have their own offsets from that input to the output common mode applied to the ADC. I suspect that shift is inconsequential to the ADC, but without a spec, cannot be sure.

    Now that you mention CMRR, that is normally really good on these diff input ADC's, but again no spec or plot that I can find - this would get into the CMRR noise rejection question at the ADC inputs. 

  • Also Steve, 

    There is a great deal of RC design work for SAR interfaces in the TI PA material, anything like that for these Audio delta sigma

    I eventually need a final C selection, and then I will set the isolating R and check phase margin, SNR, etc. 

    What kind of diff C values at the ADC inputs do you typically see/use. 

  • Hey Steve, I guess you are not going to reply, not easy if the specs are not there - have to move on and put something in this next audio interface to PCM ADc's article, that looks like this right now - 

    "Table 1. Recent precision FDAs with <-135dBc audio frequency distortion.

    The DC accuracy concerns at the ADC inputs include CM shifts from midscale and small differential offsets. The audio sigma delta ADCs will have an allowed input CM tolerance – rarely specified, the precision devices in Table 1 all offer <20mV CM offset even with the control input floated. That by itself should not impair ADC performance, but include supply voltage variation as well if the control input is floated as that output CM is just a divider off the FDA supply. Use a buffered ADC reference voltage source into the VOCM control pin if this becomes a concern."

    moving on to CM noise to  diff output noise conversion via feedback ratio mismatch - I originally assumed that would not be a big issue, but, if this floated input curve from the THS4551 PDS is correct, that is kind of scary below 100Hz - probably need to drive that Vocm input pin from a buffered version of the desired ADC Vcm input to bypass this issue completely. 

  • Hey Michael, 

    I don't mean to leave you hanging, but you are correct. these devices were designed 15-20 years ago and what we have for the specs is kinda what we have. If there is a driving opportunity we can always do some testing,  but in the absence of that there are simply too many other priorities. 

    I defer to the reference design in the datasheet for the input buffer (see figure 13).  VOCM is driven, and it is driven by VCOM.  This is the same circuit used on the EVM as I recall. 

    best regards

    -Steve Wilson

  • Sure Steve, 

    I understand, the issues that I have gleaned from this old PDS include, 

    1. the default output Vcom from the ADC is 2.5V on a 5V supply no tolerance

    2. The typ CMRR for the ADC is 85dB no DC min with no plot over F

    3.The typ input ADC input impedance is 3kohm, that might get into the gain setting if the interface R's are outside the FDA loop - again no range and no parallel C specified internally, but there. 

    4. The typ interface ckt in the PCM4202 data sheet using the OPA1632 (same die as the THS4131) is what I call an imbedded integrator to drive a Cload with very low DC source impedance. That is probably an obsolete solution at this point. 

    Is there any newer PCM type Audio ADC that I should be looking at instead? Showing more detailed info on the above and maybe an updated driver ckt. 

  • Hi Michael,

    Nice to hear from you and thanks to Steve for supporting thus far.

    1.) The PCM42xx devices output their own VCOM output signal which should be applied to the Vocm pin of the FDA that drives it.  There is likely a +/-100mV range on how well the FDA output common-mode matches the reference in the PCM42xx.  Mismatches will cause DC leakage through the input impedance but this won't be detrimental provided the driver stage can provide it.  I don't see why you'd see that large of a mismatch in common-mode when driving the Vocm pin of the FDA with the output from the PCM42xx.

    2.)  It will be relatively flat over the audio band as is common for Audio ADCs from 20Hz - 20kHz.  There may be a +/-10dB difference over the frequency range.

    3.)  Ideally you'll include the Riso resistance inside the feedback loop as shown in the PCM42xx datasheet application circuits.  If you can't get away with this due to the output impedance or other concerns with the driver, then you'll have to account for the drop in the +/-100mV i mentioned before.

    4.)  I agree this circuit has settling issues and other challenges for higher frequency signals, but the circuit on the EVM meets datasheet specifications of the ADC over audio bandwidth so unless you'll be adding a really low-noise gain stage to the input then there may be marginal improvements by optimizing the driver further.  

  • Thanks Colin, I was off looking at other things, but this is useful, 

    Yes, I have decided you cannot just float the Vocm on the FDA due to low frequency noise (here,I am aiming at a 2Hz to 50kHz span for a measurement mic). I could drive the Vocm directly from the PCM output 2.5V - is that an ok idea or should there be some kind of unity gain buffer amp. I do worry about popcorn in that buffer stage - which a chopper would fix, but then most folks worry about the switching in a chopper, If we use a buffer amp, I am almost of the opinion no output C should be used since the Vocm input to the FDA is not a sampling event, just a reference voltage to a very high impedance. (in the background, the issue about output Vcm noise for the FDA is tied into the CM to DM conversion through feedback ratio mismatch). 

    Ideally,if we wanted to use a chopper as a Vocm buffer, that would be a low cost, higher frequency device to move that chopper up out of band - the filter I am doing is looking for 100dB atten at 6Mhz, 

    Point 2, the buildout R's for an outside the loop RC are driving the differential 3kohm input of the PCM4202, not a DC level shift but a gain loss that can be recovered in the filter gain target. And again,the lack of tolerancing on that internal 3kohm leaves a gain uncertainty in the signal channel, small effect and not of great importance for this Audio app. 

    the point 4 above, the PCM4202 PDS ckt is obsolete in the sense that the THS4551 is much lower HD (at much lower power) than the THS4131 or OPA1632 equiv. We actually remeasured that back on 2006 with this result, compare this to the THS4551 datasheet . The voltage noise of the older FDA's lis ower, but normally swamped out by the R's around the device. these updates never got into the datasheets. And remember the THS4131 is the same die as the OPA1632.