Part Number: ADS131E04
I want use ADS131 in my project; i found there is 3 versions E , A and M ; What are the main diffirences ?
I read the datahseet but really i get puzzled ;
I need an PGA at the analog inputs, could you suggest to me which version suitable for my application
Thank you in advanced
Hector,The E, A, and M are all different ADCs. They all have completely different interfaces, features, and specifications. We had used ADS131 as an indication that the primary focus of this device is for energy metering. However, as an ADC, it can be used in a variety of different applications.Of these devices, the ADS131A04 does not have a PGA. However, it does have the highest dynamic range (118dB measured as the full-scale range compared to the noise floor of the device). The ADS131M04 has the lowest dynamic range (102dB). The ADS131A04 also has the best THD performance (-103.5dB), while the ADS131E08 has the lowest (-93dB). They can be configured to have different data rates (A04 128kSPS max, E04 64kSPS max, M04 32kSPS)Selecting a device will depend on your application, and what specifications are important to you. If you need a PGA, then that probably removes the ADS131A04 from consideration. What other specifications are important? What is the input range of your signal?Joseph Wu
We are glad that we were able to resolve this issue, and will now proceed to close this thread.
If you have further questions related to this thread, you may click "Ask a related question" below. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
In reply to Joseph Wu:
Thank you for nice explanation
I will use for ECG maximum +/- 10mV . single lead ECG analog that is buffered by gain 1 with ina826 to ads131
I understand that I should go with E version
if you have any comments or suggestion I would be thankful
In reply to Hector:
If you have an ECG application I would also consider the ADS1292. Also, there is some additional information about this particular application in these posts:
Thank you for support
Right now we use ads1291 for our products , in fact i am happy with it ; but we find that about 1% of the prodcuts is fail in noisy inviroment like .
since in my application we dont use RLD ; and we feed it back to the inputs but i think still not enough to reject the CMRR ; or we are doing something wrong .
So i am try to develop a new ECG one lead using OPA2188 and INA828 to ADS131E04 ; to get a higher CMRR
Also I would like to listen your suggestions if we can improve our ADS1291 to get a better result ; because with the new solution would add double extra cost
About ADS1292 i would like to use it too because of the impedance measuement; some thing i did not understand in the datasheet : it measure the voltage (reactified voltage Righ?) on the input resitor . Right?
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.