This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
I am using ADS5681 in a system in which it acts as an Arbitrary Waveform Generator (AWG) with a sampling clock frequency of 312.5 MHz.
When characterizing it with sine signals, I have found that the desired sinusoid seems to be modulated by low frequency random noise and various tones. There is nod additive noise but multiplicative. I came to this conclusion when programming the DAC with a constant digital signal, thus making the potential clock jitter irrelevant. The interfering signals where also present.
Then, I configured register BiasLPG_A (CONFIG6) to 0, thus programming a 95 kHz low pass filter in the DAC current source (instead of default value of 472 kHz). Then, the most offending spurs at +-610 kHz at -56 dBc vanished. Other reduced their amplitude.
However, some other remain, and most offending one is at +-4.8 MHz. I have made the following findings about it:
There are other spurs at lower frequencies and with lower amplitudes.
In the board there are no switch mode power supply at this frequency. I have tested to change clock frequency of other digital elements in the board, without effect.
I have observed this behaviour in all the boards I have tested.
Do you have any clue on what may be happening?
Sorry for the delayed response. Have you made any progress on this since your original post?
If not, I'd like you to look at the power supplies on a scope to verify there are no oscillations. Are you using the EVM or your own board? Can you confirm that there are adequate bypass caps very close to each power supply pin?
We are glad that we were able to resolve this issue, and will now proceed to close this thread.
If you have further questions related to this thread, you may click "Ask a related question" below. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
In reply to Matt Guibord:
Thank you Matt,
Progress has been small but not null:
I am still working on it.
In reply to Luis M Brugarolas:
Can you send me your register settings? I'd like to set this up in the lab with our EVM with your configuration.
It seems like some frequency might be coupling in from your board, but I'd like to see what my results look like.
Config data is as follows, and in described order. It is in [Address; Data] format
[ hex2dec('08') ; hex2dec('04')] [ hex2dec('02') ; hex2dec('40')] # Binary offset format [ hex2dec('05') ; hex2dec('80')] # 4 wires serial IF [ hex2dec('0A') ; hex2dec('CE')] # Fs is 300 to 350 MHz [ hex2dec('08') ; hex2dec('00')] [ hex2dec('07') ; hex2dec('FF')] # Full DACA_gain (16) [ hex2dec('06') ; hex2dec('04')] # Filter of source bias 95 kHz
Sampling frequency is 312.5 MHz.
I set up the EVM in the lab with your register settings and I don't have any spurs close to my fundamental, including no spur at 4.8 MHz offset. This leads me to believe that the DAC is not at fault and instead the signal is coupling into the DAC from another source on your board. I have a couple of suggestions for you below.
1. It is possible that an internal clock divider is leaking onto your clock line. What is your reference frequency and what are your PLL settings for the CDCE62005?
2. It is possible that you have timing errors. Can you set your data lines to all 0's and turn on the fs/4 mixer? CONFIG1 = 0x10 and CONFIG2 = 0x41. This should generate a tone at fs/4. Do you still have the spurs?
3. If you have a scope with infinite persistance, look at the data clock and see if the duty cycle of the clock varies from cycle to cycle.
Lastly, can you provide screenshot of your measured spectrum around the fundamental?
Thank you for your interest, and sorry for the delay: I had urgent tasks. It is good news there are no spurs in EVM.
1.- Clock divider. CDCE62005 uses a 25 MHz VCXO with control voltage set to mid supply. PLL comparison frequency is 6.25 MHz. The device configuration is as follows. Remember last nibble corresponds to address, and remaining 28 bits to data.
'eb800300' # DAC_SCLK: LVDS, Internal VCO 'eb800301' # DAC_FPGA_CLK: LVDS, Internal VCO '68860302' # Unused: Disabled '83400003' # ADC_SCLK: LVPECL HS, PRI-IN: Frac-N reference 'eb800314' # Test port: LVDS, Internal VCO '100c0b25' '04be09a6' # ENCAL_MODE = 1 && ENCAL = 0 'bd0037f7' '80009DD8'
2.- Your suggestion is very interesting, but I am unable to enter in this test mode besides my trials. As this mode is undocumented, I could not test if reported configuration is correct. Could you re check it?
3.- Duty cycle variation in data clock (DCLK): I am able to measure a 220 ps peak to peak duty cycle variation. Actual jitter will be something lower due to scope (TDS 744A) trigger jitter. When measuting clock with the Spectrum Analyzer, I can measure -53 dBc at 60 MHz. No jitter can be measured at 4.8 MHz altough phase noise at this frequency is far from being negligible (see attached photo)
4.- Spectrum plots: As I do not know what plot you are asking for, I will include both for clock and DAC output.
DAC Data Clock Spectrum: Low quality but readable. Marker delta at 4.8 MHz. SPAN is 12 MHz and Central frequency 156 MHz
DAC (plus driver) output spectrum when signal is Fs/4. Despite incorrect marker delta legend (I do not know why), the +-4.8 MHz spurs are clearly visible.
Hope this helps
Thinking twice the Data Clock jitter measurements, I have come to the conclusion that is reasonable to think taht this clock has no influence at all in output spurs, as this clock is just used to write data in the DAC internal FIFO.
The concern is that if there was too much jitter on the data clock you might violate setup and hold times. 220ps should be sufficient.
Regarding number 2. We do not have a test mode for this, but you could configure your FPGA to output all 0's.
I'll review the CDCE settings and get back to you.
I had our clocking team look into your CDCE settings and they also did not see any spurs around 4.8 MHz. They did mention that the loop filter was set to a wide bandwidth and that you might be able to get better performance with a lower bandwidth filter.
Could they suggest a register configuration? I worked with the excel datasheet but I could not reach to sucessful configuration.
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with respect to these materials. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.