Support,
Do we have a tutorial for getting started with revision control in CCSv5?
Thanks,
Tim
HI Tim,
let me assemble and send you some relevant material.
Cheers,
Lisa
Hi Tim,
Here some relevant available material. We do not specifically have a tutorial on version control but many of these topics are relevant and related.
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Category:CCS_Training
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Creating_portable_projects_in_CCSv5
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Project_Sharing
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Portable_Projects
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/CCSv5_Fundamentals_Workshop
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/CCSv5_Advanced_Workshop
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Category:Code_Composer_Studio_v5
Please keep us informed if there is something further you require.
Best Regards,
LIsa
Hi, I was hoping to resurrect this thread.
I'm having some trouble sharing projects through an RCS (we're using subversion). I'm trying to figure out what I'm missing.
We have the following setup (abstracted a bit):
I have the CCS project definition
\$(DEVELOPMENT_ROOT)\workspace\MY_PROJECT
and the source files
\$(DEVELOPMENT_ROOT)\MY_SRC
This local directory tree is under source control, but some individual files may not be.
Source control for the source files are not a problem. The only concern is the project itself.
So I can create a project that used linked resources, based on a local definition of DEVELOPMENT_ROOT. However this absolute path definition appears in both .project and .cproject files in the MY_PROJECT directory. So when I put the project under source, it's not really portable any more.
If Alice creates the project and puts these files under control, Bob can then check out the project. Bob can edit the definition of the DEVELOPMENT_ROOT variable, and build the project. But this changes the project definitions in .project and .cproject. and from a source-control perspective, this tree has now changed.
I do want the project settings and file list (linked resources) to be under source control. I do not want the variable definitions to be. Is there a way to do this?
Thanks for your help.
John