Hello
Is there a way to suppress diagnostic for for a few lines.
With the #pragma diag_suppress = 552 seems to work just for the whole file.
Regards Reto
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hello
Is there a way to suppress diagnostic for for a few lines.
With the #pragma diag_suppress = 552 seems to work just for the whole file.
Regards Reto
Hi,
As long as I know you can only do that for a whole file, because its an option passed to the compiler. Maybe, if you want to disable the warning for just a specific function, you could put only that function in a file and disable the warning for it.
BR
J
Reto said:Is there a way to suppress diagnostic for for a few lines.
With the #pragma diag_suppress = 552 seems to work just for the whole file.
Use #pragma diag_default id_number to change the level of a diagnostic back to the compiler default. Something like this ...
#pragma diag_suppress 552 // lines that cause the diagnostic here #pragma diag_default 552
The compiler tips and tricks presentations include a section on Compiler Diagnostics with tips like this.
Thanks and regards,
-George
Setting back with the default I already tried out. Then the occurs again. It looks as if the last pragma in file defines the whole file behavior.
I'm confused. Isn't this what you expect? Please show an example of what you are doing, and describe in detail how it does not behave as you expect.
Thanks and regards,
-George
#pragma diag_suppress 552
static DT_BOOL HallSensorSignal[3] = {DT_FALSE, DT_FALSE, DT_FALSE};
#pragma diag_default 552
When I use the code the warning is still there. The warning just disappears when I not use the #pragma diag_default 552. But I need the warnings for the other lines. I'm using c2000 tools with the compiler 6.1.4.
I couldn't reproduce diagnostic 552 based on the one source line you show here. I finally looked it up here. Now I understand the nature of your complaint. In summary, there is no clean solution. I'll try to explain.
Diagnostic 552 says: variable name is set but never used. It is different from most other diagnostics in that it is associated with a specific variable and not specific source line. For that reason, the #pragma method of controlling it doesn't work. The #pragma method controls whether you see a specific diagnostic across some range of source lines. There is no method to control the few diagnostics associated with a variable. Attempting to use the #pragma method only shows, as you have seen, that it doesn't really work.
Thanks and regards,
-George