Tool/software: Linux
Hi,
There is no mention of the information of the register of HD_VENC_D_XXX in TRM(sprugz7e.pdf) of AM3874.
In TRM(sprugz8g.pdf) of DM8148, explanation of OSD_AVD_VW1 bit of the register of HD_VENC_D_cfg23 has following mentions.
Defines the number of active lines for the input frame (or first field) of the HD_VENC_D.
Normally, this should be same as DVO_AVD_VW1.
Does the condition mentioned above apply to it in AM3874?
When OSD_AVD_VW1 is not same as DVO_AVD_VW1, a flag is set in underflow status bit of the clkc_underflow register.
When it is the same, the flag is not set in underflow status bit of the clkc_underflow register.
In the case of ezsdk of linux, a different value is set in it, and a flag of bit is set.
Should these registers usually make the same setting as use?
Best Regards,
Shigehiro Tsuda