This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Why is ustdlib not library code?

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: AM1808

In AM1808 StarterWare 1.00.03.03

There are currently three copies of ustdlib.c and ustdlib.h in evmAM1808/examples, with the following differences:

  • usb_dev_bulk
    - oldest: commented as "Stellaris"
  • grlib_demo
    - newer: commented as "Sitaraware"
  • usb_dev_serial
    - newest: "Sitaraware" + several changes to "unsigned long" from "unsigned int"

Also, Ustdlib_api is included in the Modules section of the chm documentation file...

Shouldn't this all be a single copy of library code?