This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
What type of protection on the VBUS do you recommend for the USB (3.0/3.1/3.2) Type C connector ?
In previous USB 2.0 Designs we have used a Littlefuse PGB1010603 PULSE-GUARD® ESD Suppressors
We are using both the TI TPD6S300 and TI TPD2S300 to protect the other USB Type C signals !
I believe the question you're asking was answered in a previous thread, which can be found here: https://e2e.ti.com/support/interface/circuit-protection/f/389/t/650941.
I recommend placing high-speed ESD diodes (TPD1E5B04DPYR) on each USB3.1 channels. Feel free to look at one of our PD controller EVM schematic, such as the TPS65981-EVM. Page 23 of the user's guide shows the connection of these ESD diodes on the Type-C connector (look below):
It's also recommended to place a Schottky diode and a 0.1uF cap on each VBUS channel.
Lastly, I don't beleive you need both the TPD6s300 and TPD2s300. You would need just one of these protection devices per Type-C port.
TPD2s300: CCx protection
TPD6s300: CCx, SBUx, and one USB2.0 channel protection
TPD8s300: CCx, SBUx, and both USB2.0 channel protection
If this answers your question, PLEASE select This resolved my issue
Aramis P. Alvarez
In reply to Aramis P. Alvarez:
Thank you so much for this reply, it has helped me a lot in getting a better understanding of the circuit protection requirements. I am now looking at the schematic of the TPS65981-EVM and seeing there is a lot more protection on that board that what I have planned !
Firstly we are NOT going to be using \ designing USB PD. To get enough power we have planned to use 2 Type C connectors one for Communication and power and the 2nd connector solely for additional power. This explains why we are using both the the TPD6s300 and TPD2s300.
1. I see that there are Schottky diodes D4-D10, & D12 on the Tx\Rx lines ! For my non-PD design is this required \ recommended ?
2. In the HD3SS3220 data sheet they mention using "the TI TPD4EUSB30 can be combined with the TI TPD2EUSB30 to provide flow-through ESD protection for both USB2 and USB3 differential signals". (This probably answers my above question ?) WHen I looked at these data sheets they are for USB 3.0 as expected. Would it be better to use a similar device but that give protection for USB 3.1 since we might go to that in the future ? Thus we will only need to stock 1 device if it is compatible with both 3.0 & 3.1 ?! What do you recommend ? Would, lets say TPD4E02B04-Q1 be a better choice ?
3. We will be using the FTDI FT601 chip to do the interfacing to the USB 3.0 bus. In our previous USB 2.0 design FTDI recommended also PulseGuard ESD Suppressors - PGB1010603 on the USB 2.0 DP/DM signals as well as 10pF Caps to GND. When I asked them about this requirement for this design using the FT601 they claimed that it was necessary as a different PHY is being used. When I looked at the data sheet for the FT601 ESD and Latch-up Specifications :-
Human Body Mode (HBM) - JEDEC EIA/JESD22- A114-B, Class 2 - ±2kV
Machine mode (MM) - JEDEC EIA/JESD22- A115-A, Class B - ±200V
Charged Device Mode (CDM) - JEDEC EIA/ JESD22-C101- D, Class-III - ±500V
Latch-up JESD78, Trigger Class-II - ±200mA
In your opinion is this enough ? In the TPD4E02B04-Q1 data sheet they recommend on the USB 2.0 lines to use TPD4E05U06-Q1 ? What do you think ?
In reply to Shmuel Davis:
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with respect to these materials. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.