This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi Sean,
You seem have confusion. The customer just want to know a minimum effective pulse width to enter the power down state as a reset state which caused by the PDB pin “1” to “0” signal level.
Why the customer wants to know the minimum effective pulse width for the PDB pin is they not want to enter the power down state during operating condition by something accident as to pull down the PDB pin by very small width pulse noise or glitch noise. If they will know the width, probably they will put a something filter which is based on the minimum effective pulse width. Without the value it’s impossible to avoid such situation in the customer. I think if internal circuit of the PDB doesn’t have a filter which can eliminate very small width pulse noise or glitch noise, the value should be very small as less than few ns or more small.
Could you check the value? Without the value the customer can’t enter mass production, so we need your help.
Best regards,
Izumi Maruyama
Hello Izumi,
My sincere apologies for the delay.
We do not spec the minimum pulse width on the PDB pin. However, if the customer is using our recommended RC circuit (10uF + 10kOhm) on the PDB pin then typically the capacitance should be large enough to filter out any GND-level noise that will pull the PDB pin down closer to 0. Filter circuits on the PDB pin to prevent a glitch like you are explaining are not common due to this reason.
Does Clarion expect their application to have constant noise injection on this PDB pin?
-Sean