This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

SN65HVD3080E, SN65HVD485E with photocoupler

Guru 20090 points
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN65HVD3080E, SN65HVD485E, ISO7341C, ISO3082, ISO3080

Hello,

Can we use SN65HVD3080E and SN65HVD485E with the photocoupler?

They using the photocoupler to D,DE,RE,R pins.
Signal rate:19.8kbps~100kbps
Photocoupler parts number is TLP293.

I think that we can use the photo coupler for R output.
However regarding D,DE and RE input, it is difficult to using photocoupler due to the internal resister  values are not specified.
Is my understanding correct ?

On the other hand, I'm proposing the digital isolator instead of photocoupler.
Since the signal rate is not fast and photocoupler cheap, they don't use the digital isolator.
Please kindly advice for promoting the digital isolator instead of photocoupler.

Best Regards,
Ryuji Asaka

  • Hello Asaka san,

    I see no issue using the optocoupler with the listed transceivers.
    Usually you have an external pull-up resistor to VCC and the transistor integrated in the coupler switching to ground. Do you worry about the internal resistance of the coupler or the transceiver input pins?

    When proposing our digital isolators you can promote the reduced number of parts needed and the saved board space. For the SN65HVD485E for example you could propose the ISO7341C, which is a 3 channel forward plus one channel backwards device and so integrates all needed isolation channels. So you have to compare this with 4 of the above mentioned photocouplers.
    Do you know which requirements for the isolation voltage your customer has?

    Another option could be a complete integration of the isolation into the transceiver devices, which would even save more boardspace and reduce the number of parts to one. You can check the ISO3082 for half-duplex and the ISO3080 for full-duplex applications.

    I am glad to help you if you have any other questions.

    Kind regards,
    Chris

  • Hello Chris san,

    Thank you for the reply.
    I understood.

    Yes, I worry about the internal resistance of the transceiver input pins.
    Are there recommended resistor value ?

    Best Regards,
    Ryuji Asaka

  • Hello Chris san,

    Sorry again.
    The customer using the optcoupler as emiter folower with 10kohms  pull down resistor.
    Please see the attached file as the connection of RE,DE and opt copler.
    Can I use SN65HVD485E with this connection?

    Best Regards,
    Ryuji Asaka

  • Asaka san,

    you are always welcome to ask!

    As long as the voltage at RE, DE and D is less than 800 mV for a low logic input state and above 2 V for a high logic input state as specified in the datasheet, this works fine.

    With the internal resistances given in the equivalent input diagrams on page 10, I have calculated a low level input voltage of about 250 mV for the setup you have shown above. So it should work without a problem.

    Best regards,

    Chris

  • Hello Chris san,

    Thank you for the reply.
    I think that the there are the variation in the internal resistor.
    Is this schematics no problem with the variation of the internal resistor?

    Best Regards,
    Ryuji Asaka
  • Hello Asaka san,

    you are right. There will be a variation of the internal resistance. The better parameter to look at is the input current for the D, DE, RE pins.

    It is specified as maximum 100 µA in the datasheet. This is based on simulations for VCC at 5V. So you can conclude to a minimum internal resistance to VCC of 50 kOhms. With an external 10 kOhm resistor you can calculate the voltage divider and get an absolute maximum logic low input voltage of about 833 mV.  
    This is above this threshold.

    So to be absolutely safe you should use an external resistor with a value smaller or equal to 9 kOhms (also take the tolerance of the external resistor into account, I calculated with +/- 5%).

    The 100 µA input current seems to be specified quite conservative though, since it is a common practice to use 10 kOhm external pull-up or pull-downs.
    Bench tests have shown much lower maximum currents, which safely allow the use of 10 kOhms for an external pull-down.

    Thanks for your good input.

    Best regards,
    Chris

  • Hello Chris san,

    Thank you for the reply.
    I understood your point.

    In this case, 10kohm pulldown resistor is connected to DE and RE.
    I think that the worst case of internal resister is 50kohm from DE pin to GND and from RE pin to Vcc.
    Thus the pull down resister will be parallel of 10kohm and 50kohm, and it is 8.33kohm.
    Therefore, the VIL is about 730mV.
    Is my calculation correct?

    Best Regards,
    Ryuji Asaka

  • Hello Asaka san,

    please excuse the delayed response, I have been out of office last week.

    You are right. My calculations considered only the separate DE and RE pins. 
    The worst case for the topology of DE and RE tied together and an external 10k pull-down would be the smallest possible internal pull-up at RE and the largest possible pull-down at DE.

    I am checking with our design team right now how exactly the internal resistors are set up and which maximum variation can be expected.
    I will come back to you as soon as I have the required information.

    Best regrads,
    Chris    

  • Hello Chris san,

    Thank you for the reply.
    I'm looking forward to the information of internal resistor variation.

    Best Regards,
    Ryuji
  • Hello Asaka san,

    I have talked to our designers and we could find some data on the device and its internal pull-up and pull-down resistors.
    The statement based on this data is that the internal resistors will not deviate too much from each other.

    So it should cause no problems using the SN65HVD3080E and SN65HVD485E with the photocoupler.

    Best regards,
    Chris