Part Number: TRS3232E
I am trying to replace Exar SP3232EB with our TRS3232EI and my customer has one concern on the datarate.
In SP3232EB datasheet, the minimum value of the maximum datarate is 250 kbps.
However, the datarate is shown as 150 kbps(min.) and 250 kbps(typ.) which says that our datarate could be in the range of 150 kbps to 250 kbps.
My customer is concerned about this since they need the datarate to be higher than 250 kbps.
Is it just related to the way of defining the spec or our device just behaves this way?
I think the two devices have similar performance at 250kbps, although the datasheet specifies it differently. If your customer wants to support a higher data rate, you can recommend TRSF3232E (www.ti.com/.../trsf3232e.pdf) that has minimum 1Mbps data rate. Please let me know if you have more questions.
We are glad that we were able to resolve this issue, and will now proceed to close this thread.
If you have further questions related to this thread, you may click "Ask a related question" below. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
In reply to Hao L:
Is there any way to verify this through bench test?
By 250 kbps (typ.), it means that a certain portion of this device would support 250 kbps but some would not.
Is there a way to show that this device work well at 250 kbps?
If there's any material or test result, please send it to me via email.
In reply to Roy Hsu:
Yes we could test several devices, but probably we won't see the process variation due to limited samples. If a device doesn't support 250kbps, it can still communicate but might be short on some spec like output voltage. These behavior is a statistical spread over the voltage, temperature and process.
We have decided to switch to TRSF3232EI. Now, the capacitor values for different Vcc are different.
Why is that? Is it OK to use 4 0.1 uF caps for 5V Vcc?
If not, what effect will it bring?
Roy, The capacitor values impact the ripple of the output voltage. You can take a look at this post for some details (e2e.ti.com/.../463809). The rule of thumb is that if the flying cap C1 is smaller and the storage cap C3 is bigger, the ripple is smaller. Therefore we recommend different values for 5V supply. Regards, Hao
(sorry for the broken link. I fixed it.)
It's OK to use 0.1uF cap, with the drawback of higher ripples. Many customers prefer to have less ripples for better signal quality such as less emi.
To give you visual comparison, I attach two waveforms here.
You can tell the second graph has bigger ripples.
Please let me know if you have more questions.
The falling slope should not impact data transmission since the voltage level is above 5V (RS232 standard). I agree with your comments. Please let me know if your customer has any questions or concerns.
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with respect to these materials. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.