• Join
  • Sign In with my.TI Login
Texas Instruments
  • Products
  • Applications
  • Tools & Software
  • Support & Community
  • Sample & Buy
  • About TI
Sample & Purchase Cart Sample & Purchase Cart
  • Search
  • Advanced
TI E2E™ Community
  • Support Forums
  • Blogs
  • Groups
  • Videos
  • 简体中文
  • More ...
TI Home » TI E2E Community » Support Forums » Microcontrollers » MSP430™ Microcontrollers » MSP430 Ultra-Low Power 16-bit Microcontroller Forum » Reducing Power Consumption of chip
Share
MSP430™ Microcontrollers
  • Forum
  • Announcements
  • E2E Wiki
Options
  • Subscribe via RSS
MSP430 Resources
  • MSP430 Product Folder
  • MSP-EXP430G2 - MSP430 LaunchPad Value Line Development kit
  • MSP430 Getting Started Guide
  • MSP430 Microcontroller Projects
  • More Resources >
  • Forums

    Reducing Power Consumption of chip

    This question is not answered
    KCheung
    Posted by KCheung
    on Mar 05 2009 21:44 PM
    Intellectual455 points

    I was wondering if anyone knew a way to reduce the power consumption of the chip.

    Right now we put the radio link to sleep whenever it's not in use and then wake it up when whenever we use it. Also, we don't use the LED lights when we don't have to (although I don't know how much power that saves).  Are there any other things we can do to use less power while running the chip.

    Report Abuse
    • Reply
    You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
    All Replies
    • BrandonElliott
      Posted by BrandonElliott
      on Mar 06 2009 09:26 AM
      Genius13855 points

      Turning off as much peripherals as possible when not in use will lower the current consumption. To estimate the current consumption for the MSP430, the device datasheet lists numbers for each operating mode with certain frequencies and operating voltages. Additionally each peripheral's current consumption is listed separately in it's corresponding section of the datasheet. Adding these values as needed can give a good estimate on current consumption but experimental testing is needed to determine the actual consumption your peripheral configuration will exhibit in the field.

      We have a couple of related k-base articles on this which you may find useful:

      1.

      http://www-k.ext.ti.com/SRVS/CGI-BIN/WEBCGI.EXE/,/?St=26,E=0000000000014017023,K=2246,Sxi=12,Case=obj(37929)

      Problem:
      Especially in low power modes the supply current is higher than expected!
      
      

       

      Solution:
      One issue that can lead to higher supply current consumption than expected is unused inputs. To prevent this, all unused I/O pins must be left open, switched to port function and their direction configured as outputs. The correct termination of all unused pins is listed in the Connection of Unused Pins section of the System Resets, Interrupts, and Operating Modes chapter of the device user`s guide.
      
      
      

      Hint:
      It is good design practice to connect an unused Test/Vpp pin to Vss(GND). If this pin needs to be routed to the JTAG-connector for debugging, an external pull-down resistor will improve EMI/EMC performance.

      
      2.
      

      http://www-k.ext.ti.com/SRVS/CGI-BIN/WEBCGI.EXE/,/?St=26,E=0000000000014017023,K=2246,Sxi=12,Case=obj(51373)

      
      
      

      Problem:
      Why is the supply current higher than expected especially in low power modes?

      -->Why is the supply current higher than expected especially in low power modes?

      Solution:

      Solution:
      MSP430: Current consumption is high in Low Power modes -->

      A few things to check for low current consumption are: a) All unused I/O pins must be left open,

      switched to port function and their direction configured as outputs. The correct termination of all unused pins is listed in the

      Connection of Unused Pins section of the System Resets,  Interrupts, and Operating Modes chapter of the device user`s guide.

      a) Is the ADC reference turned off? Please see Datasheet

      b) Is the comparator turned off? Please see Datasheet

      c) If using XT2, is XT2 turned off?

      d) Verify the connections on MSP430’s inputs even when in LPM mode?

      e) Is the device clean (flux, unwanted solder)?

       


      
      

      Report Abuse
      • Reply
      You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
    • KCheung
      Posted by KCheung
      on Mar 06 2009 13:54 PM
      Intellectual455 points

      Great! Thanks a lot for this!

      Report Abuse
      • Reply
      You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
    • romain145
      Posted by romain145
      on Sep 29 2009 15:10 PM
      Prodigy30 points

      Hi,

       

      I'm looking for the Timer_A (and Watchdog) power consumption. I didn't find anything in the datasheets.

      I'm using MSP430F1612 and MSP430F2274.

      Could you tell me where is this information (page number) ?

      Regards

      Romain

      Report Abuse
      • Reply
      You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
    • adrian
      Posted by adrian
      on Sep 29 2009 15:25 PM
      Expert4400 points

      Romain
      I'm looking for the Timer_A (and Watchdog) power consumption. I didn't find anything in the datasheets.

      the power consumption of the timers isn't speced because it doesn't add a significant power adder to the base currents speced and they're usually assumed to be on during low power modes like LPM3.  timer functions are basically "free" from a power perspective.

      Report Abuse
      • Reply
      You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
    • romain145
      Posted by romain145
      on Sep 30 2009 15:42 PM
      Prodigy30 points

      Ok for a low power application, but I'm working on very low power application (10 years autonomy).

      I thought about using the watchdog in LPM3 instead of using timers in order to reduce the current (with all others peripherals OFF). Is this a good idea, or is there any difference ?

      In this case, I would change for an external power system shutting off the MSP430.

      Thank you !

      Report Abuse
      • Reply
      You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
    • adrian
      Posted by adrian
      on Sep 30 2009 16:20 PM
      Expert4400 points

      Romain

      Ok for a low power application, but I'm working on very low power application (10 years autonomy).

      I thought about using the watchdog in LPM3 instead of using timers in order to reduce the current (with all others peripherals OFF). Is this a good idea, or is there any difference ?

      In this case, I would change for an external power system shutting off the MSP430.

      Romain,

      in terms of power consumptions, you won't see a difference between Timer_A/B or the WDT.  If the WDT does what you need and you just need a basic interval timer, then use it.  You'll get a bit more functionality out of Timer_A/B but if you don't need those extra features then any of the timers will be fine.

      What kind of duty cycle (Active time vs Sleep time) are you expecting for your application? 10+ year battery life isn't uncommon for 430 apps.

      Report Abuse
      • Reply
      You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
    • romain145
      Posted by romain145
      on Oct 01 2009 05:43 AM
      Prodigy30 points

      Thank you Adrian,

      I'll use one timer (B) clocked with ACLK in active and sleep mode. I'm working on Wireless Sensor Network, the duty cycle is variable between 0.1 and 3sec, so I must have a consumption model to simulate the network life.

      If, one day, you find currents of the peripherals, i'm still interested ! [;)]

      Report Abuse
      • Reply
      You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
    • Didier Blanc
      Posted by Didier Blanc
      on May 04 2012 08:47 AM
      Prodigy20 points

      Hi,

      I'm also making battery supplied sensors with long lifetimes (>10 years). I'm using an MSP430G2433 and my total budget is 3uA. with 3.6V supply, I could measure about 400nA consumption for one Timer_A  at 32kHz. If I use both Timers, I come to 0.8uA. This represents 26% of my total budget.

      So I'd be very interrested in typical and maximum Timer consumption values.

      Regards,

      D. Blanc

      Report Abuse
      • Reply
      You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
    TI E2E™ Community
    • Support Forums
    • Blogs
    • Videos
    • Groups
    • Site Support & Feedback
    • Settings
    TI E2E™ Community Groups
    • TI University Program
    • Make the Switch
    • Microcontroller Projects
    • Motor Drive & Control
    Other Communities
    • Deyisupport
    • Designsomething.org
    • beagleboard.org
    • TI on Element 14
    • TI on TechXchangeSM
    Other Technical & Support Resources
    • WEBENCH® Design Center
    • Product Information Centers
    • Technical Documents
    • TI Design Network
    • TI Technical Articles
    • TI Training

    All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with respect to these materials. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.

    Content on this site may contain or be subject to specific guidelines or limitations on use. All postings and use of the content on this site are subject to the Terms of Use of the site; third parties using this content agree to abide by any limitations or guidelines and to comply with the Terms of Use of this site. TI, its suppliers and providers of content reserve the right to make corrections, deletions, modifications, enhancements, improvements and other changes to the content and materials, its products, programs and services at any time or to move or discontinue any content, products, programs, or services without notice.

    Follow Us Texas Instruments on Facebook Texas Instruments on Twitter Texas Instruments on LinkedIn Texas Instruments on Google+
    TI Worldwide | Contact Us | my.TI Login | Site Map | Corporate Citizenship | mobile m.ti.com (Mobile Version)

    TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs and
    embedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.

    © Copyright 1995-2013 Texas Instruments Incorporated. All rights reserved.
    Trademarks | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use