Thank you, TI.

Hi Alexey,

Thank you for sharing this feedback with us. It's great to hear, and we really appreciate it! Like in the thread below, feedback about our products from users like you will help them continue to improve.

https://e2e.ti.com/support/microcontrollers/msp430/f/166/t/533330#pi316701

Regards,

James

MSP Customer Applications

... a singularity of analog and digital signals and data.

Your products usually exceed ... my skills to use it in a full potential.

Do I sense a certain kind of irony here, or is it just my own perception, projected onto others ... ;-)

F.m., we are talking about what was implemented in real hardware by humans (or by human technologies) compare to natural wildlife. But don't be naïve to think that I did not spent some time to research this area also before, especially in signal processing. ;)

But don't be naïve to think that I did not spent some time to research this area also before, especially in signal processing. ;)

I didn't expect it to be different. Just felt some ambiguity in the wording ...

F.m., we are talking about what was implemented in real hardware by humans (or by human technologies) compare to natural wildlife.

I would be careful with that. Investigating those "wildlife" - related fields, one gets the impression that humans/scientists vastly underestimated the complexity and inter-relatedness of life and life-related processes. Each step forward in technology just reveals another layer of complexity in life. They can't really figure out how the human brain works, but are convinced they can emulate it artificially (i.e. "AI").

For those interested, try searching "brain" + "consciousness". Especially the latter is a great mystery to mainstream scientists ...

I respect Karl's Pribram (Stanford publication) research in basics of neural signal processing. But I have my own also.

I respect Karl's Pribram (Stanford publication) research in basics of neural signal processing.

Last year advanced to Roger Penrose and Michael Persinger et.al., and their research. Quite interesting, and leading directly into the Quantum Abyss.

But I have my own also.

Can't really afford this, but have some related application projects in the private pipeline. Can someone donate a SQUID, perhaps ?

f. m. said:

Last year advanced to Roger Penrose and Michael Persinger et.al., and their research. Quite interesting, and leading directly into the Quantum Abyss.

Very interesting turn out. :)

f. m. said:

Can't really afford this, but have some related application projects in the private pipeline. Can someone donate a SQUID, perhaps?

Does it mean "respect"? - Of course, no. So, do not expect "share the results".

Does it mean also "share the results"? - Of course, no. So, do not expect donations. :)

Does it mean "respect"? - Of course, no. So, do not expect "share the results".

Does it mean also "share the results"? - Of course, no. So, do not expect donations. :)

That leads me to (one) crux of modern science. Look hard who funded - and still funds - Michael Persinger's research. While it starts with our tax money, every practical application disappears in the usual technology sinks, and barring some papers and general schematics, nothing is shared.

All the stuff I try to replicate already exists, so there is nothing really new. I just don't happen to have the proper "connections" to get this kind of make-work science founded by others ... ;-)

f. m. said:

nothing is shared

US institutes and research centers spend billions of dollars on neuroscience and AI. So, should they share for free yielded results to worldwide community? Or should they put it on civil economy, if it can easily be put on military rails?

f. m. said:

Look hard who funded

I finished my research 10 yeas ago. I hadn't seen any respect since then from those who received documented description and results.

f. m. said:

try to replicate already exists

Military top-secret technologies can be far beyond civil counterparts. Trying to disclose them can lead up to a military prosecution.

US institutes and research centers spend billions of dollars on neuroscience and AI.

And where does this money come from ?

From taxation, or, as others state it, legalized extortion by the threat of violence.

It all boils down to the question if a state and government are really a legitimate representation of the people that happen to live on a certain territory. Seems we are not in full agreement here, so the rest of the mentioned issues is consequently interpreted differently.

I'd better stop here ...

f. m. said:

Seems we are not in full agreement here

There are a few people who are openly digging so deep. I respect you and understand you, but yes, - better not to discuss such things, because all these lead to who are good and who are evil.

I respect you and understand you, ...

As I do respect other people's opinion, even if it differs from mine (as long as it's their own).

...- better not to discuss such things, because all these lead to who are good and who are evil.

This, and because we might again be wrist-slapped for digressing too far on a tech-specialized forum ...