This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Part Number: UCC28950
I am in the paper designing stage to develop a 960W phase shifted full bridge with zvs using ucc28950. I am referring to app note SLUA560C for the same. A PFC pre-regulator precedes this power stage. The output is 24 ~ 28Vdc, 960W. I am thinking of designing the bridge with switching frequency of 140KHz.
Based on the schematic given on page 26 of the app note, I am seeking help for the following -
1. How to design the Shim inductor L2 and Output inductor L1 ? I would like to know the design equations and how to select the core size etc for the same.
2. Which core should I use for the current transformer T1 ?
3. I am thinking of using 2 x UCC21521 (isolated dual gate driver) to drive the bridge Mosfets (I am not very big fan of drive transformers !). Please advise if this selection is ok ? If not, what do you recommend ?
The PSFB is a good choice for this power level and input voltage. I'm not quite sure why you choose 140kHz as a switching frequency but it will be ok from the point of view of the controller. The usual EMI limits start at 150kHz so if your intention was to have the switching fundamental to be less than 150kHz then there are some things you should consider.
The EMI receiver bandwidth is normally 9kHz so it will have some response at 140kHz and this will show up on the plots.
The oscillator tolerance of the UCC28951 is about ±8% so if you set a nominal 140kHz switching frequency then you could have up to 151kHz on some units, neglecting tolerances on the timing resistor.
To sum up - unless you have a specific reason for choosing 140kHz, then you may be better to run at a slightly lower frequency.
The shim inductor and transformer inductance/turns ratios are calculated in the Excel design calculator. This is a starting point and you may have mechanical limitations on heigth or mounting preferences (SMT or THP, flying leads to the PCB etc) and my advice would be to discuss the magnetics with a magnetics supplier.
My advice would be to purchase the current transformer as a standard component from a catalog rather than trying to design one yourself.
The UCC21521 is a good choice for the MOSFET driver. It's simple to use, has a robust isolation barrier and is low profile.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions.
We are glad that we were able to resolve this issue, and will now proceed to close this thread.
If you have further questions related to this thread, you may click "Ask a related question" below. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
In reply to Colin Gillmor:
Thank you so much for your response. To answer your question first - I chose 140KHz because, as you have guessed correctly, I wanted to keep fundamental frequency below 150KHz. However, my magnetics supplier had suggested me 200KHz as well, in a quest to reduce the transformer heating because with 200KHz, the number of turns could be lesser and the wire size could be bigger to reduce the copper losses. I am still undecided which one to use. What do you suggest ?
On the shim inductor : Can the leakage inductance of the main transformer be considered as shim inductor ? I could do away with an additional shim inductor in that case.
Unfortunately, my magnetics supplier is not very well versed with this PSFB topology (He is an expert in LLC) hence I am seeking TI's guidance here. I too don't have hands on experience on this topology.
In reply to Sanjay Pusalkar:
I'd suggest that you use the UCC28951 instead of the UCC28950. The UCC28951 is a newer drop in replacement device that works better when operating simultaneously at Dmax and in current limit.
The easy question first: yes, you can certainly use the leakage inductance of the transformer and if the leakage inductance is large enough you will be able to eliminate the shim inductance. One of the features of the LLC is that it can use transformers with large leakage inducatnce to form part of the resonant circuit. the PSFB is also relatively intolerant of leakage inductance and I'd expect that your magnetics manufacturer can design a transformer for your application with a well controlled amount of leakage.
Most of the applications using the UCC28951 run at 100kHz although some customers are running it at 200kHz so you should not have any problems with the controller if you decide to use 200kHz. In fact we have at least one reference design using this part running at 300kHz (PMP20657).
A higher switching frequency will allow you to use a smaller transformer core. Core losses per unit volume will increase but will be offset by a smaller core volume. Copper losses due to proximity losses and skin effect will increase as the switching frequency increases too. These can be offset by using litz wire and other techniques.
I'd suggest that unless you have a requirement to minimise the design size that you keep to a 100kHz switching frequency. Note of course that even if you manage to significantly reduce the core size, you may not get much of a reduction in the overall product size because the switching MOSFETs, control circuit, heatsinking and so on won't get smaller.
Please let me know if you need any further information.
Thank you for your suggestions. In fact, I have already ordered samples of UCC28950. Let me fire the first proto using it. May be later on I can changeover to UCC28951 !
One quick question on the switching frequency - When you say that switching frequency is 100KHz, it means that Mosfets in the bridge are switching at 50KHz, right ?
Moreover, I tried using the excel calculator. I am not very sure why there is "measured leakage inductance" before it is actually calculated ? I mean, how can one measure leakage before the transformer is actually built ?
The excel calculator no doubt helps to determine the electrical parameters like inductance value of inductors but what I am specifically looking for is to determine/ select the correct core.
First, when I say 100kHz switching frequency I mean the switching frequency at the MOSFET bridge and this is the frequency calculated by the equations in the data sheet (eq10 and eq11). The output inductor will see a switching rate of twice this or 200kHz.
The use of the term 'Measured Transformer Primary Leakage Inductance' is a bit misleading. You should put the expected leakage inductance here, or put in the amount of leakage inductance required so that the 'Calculated Shim Inductance' result becomes 0. Once you have a physical transformer in your hand you should measure it to see if it meets the designed value. Here is a link to a document that gives some more details about how the ZVS behaviour is affected by the inductances./cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/196/6355.ZVS_5F00_SubSet.docx
Transformer design is not trivial and I'm afraid I won't be able to help you very much. However you might want to look at the document at
and the TI Magnetics Design Handbook by Lloyd Dixon at https://www.ti.com/seclit/ml/slup132/slup132.pdf
(the section on fractional turns should be treated with caution but you won't need fractional turns in any case)
If you are looking for a text book then I'd recommend 'Transformers and Inductors for Power Electronics: Theory, Design and Applications' by W.G. Hurley, W.H. Wölfle: Published by Wiley ISBN: 978-1-119-95057-8
Thank you for your reply and apologies for not responding immediately as I was not in office.
We have begun drawing schematic diagram of the project which I wish to have reviewed by you and your team. However, I am not sure how do I share the schematic with you ? I would not be able to share it on the forum because of our company policy.
The schematic drawing is likely to get completed by this weekend. Going forward, I would also like to share the PCB layout when it will be done for your expert comments.
Please advise how do you want me to share the files ? I would prefer sharing on email, if you say so. In that case, please advise your mail id.
Thanks and regards,
I'm glad to hear that you are making progress. Yes, I'd be happy to review your schematic, please send them to me directly at firstname.lastname@example.org
I'll also be happy to review your PCB too and you can send them to the same address - I can read a wide variety of native files (Altium, PADS etc) or Gerber files.
I'm going to close this thread. We can continue this discussion via email - please send me the files when you have them ready to the email address I have given you earlier.
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.