Is an LTSpice model of the UCC28950 available?
I am using the TINA simulator now because it has the encrypted UCC28950 model, but the learning curve of this simulator is very steep and awkward (for one used to LTSpice).
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Is an LTSpice model of the UCC28950 available?
I am using the TINA simulator now because it has the encrypted UCC28950 model, but the learning curve of this simulator is very steep and awkward (for one used to LTSpice).
Mike 1414007 said:Sorry TI is not licensed to make LTSpice models.
No license is needed: just encrypt TI's PSpice .subckt with the LTSpice built-in tool and your IP will be as secure as it is now. I am not asking for an UCC28950 model that uses LTSpice proprietary code blocks, nor am I requesting to have an unencrypted model.
Hello Mike,
I'm also using TI-TINA for simulating the UCCC28950.
Compared to LTSpice a lot of jobs are much more complicate (select a trace for viewing, viewing power, RMS and average values)
And some things I could not manage (for example to view a sliding RMS value).
Also the documentation for the advanced topics is very poor.
In one sentence: I'm very disappointed from TI-TINA and unhappy to be forced to use this tool ...
Is there a chance that TI builds an encrypted subcurcuit for the UCC28950 to be used with LTSpice as suggested by Marcel?
Regards, Florian
I kindly agree with Florian.
By not giving open Spice Syntax (under .subckt), TI is pushing away the designers from using the parts.
Hello,
does it work if you download the pspice average (or transient) model and copy the .subckt part from inside the .lib file? you can paste that into ltspice and you will have your part, correct? (I didn't do it, so not 100% sure)
No, the information in the .lib is encrypted. It can only be read by Pspice or TINA.
This development seriously worries me. I respect TI's desire to protect its IP, but they should not limit my desire to use the best tools there are.
-marcel
you are right, I was confused by the fact that ltspice actually allows my to create a symbol from the subckt directive. It recognize pinout correctly but when trying to run the simulation gives an error "too few nodes".
In another post, they suggested to request the unencripted model to your local AFA (?). See last post here
http://e2e.ti.com/support/development_tools/webench_design_center/f/234/t/225538.aspx