This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Low Cost UHF RFID Reader IC

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC1101, CC1200

Hi,

Which is the cheapest Gen2 UHF RFID reader IC available in the market? 

It should be able to read tags in the vicinity (~1-1.5m). Number of tags that can be read at a time is not a constraint.

  • Srikanth - 

    from TI we have general purpose Sub 1GHz transceivers which can be used for this application. 

    the company TSS has created development kit, finished readers and module based on them - most likely this best option around since just the IC (from any vendor) will not be all what you are really looking for i think.

    check them out ==>  

     

  • Hi Josh,

    The price of TSS reader is about 250 EURO, very high! (www.therfidshop.com/advanced_search_result.php;osCsid=2be4c8b39cebeb162a3e518d24f45ccc).

    I came across this PPT by TI
    e2e.ti.com/.../2766.5430.TI_5F00_RFID-Reader_5F00_June-25.pdf

    The BOM cost for reference circuits in above PPT is less than USD 20. Is there any reason why TSS product price is too high apart from profit margins and benchmarking of price with other products in market?

    Also, where can I buy evaluation board in above PPT?

    Regards
    Srikanth
  • the PPT you found was the concept basis for what can be done with the CC430, CC1101 or CC1200 or CC13xx parts + MCU. it was strictly a prototype concept - not something that was made for more than proof of concept.

    UHF ICs specific to this application from other vendors with MOQs of higher than 1 start in the ~$40 range (before you add anything else to the circuit), so this was the motivation to show how an interrogator could be realized with a little ingenuity.

    You have an interesting point of view in light of the link you sent has similar handheld reader right next to it from another vendor for almost 3x the cost, and folks making these types of readers - bear with me for a moment.

    for this application, to create a circuit design and end product which is robust and capable of meeting WW EMC and Safety regulations and the demands put on it by the application itself requires an experienced staff of at least one EE, one ME, one SE, a good RF layout person, and a good RF technician. Then you have testing and product submission costs (Regulatory (EMC and Safety, for WW operation), production costs, marketing, website development, and management of the product(s) and the people, not to mention the overhead of having a location with a good lab and all the equipment and software needed to accomplish the overall task. These folks have done all that. 

    think about that for a moment, then reflect on the fact you saw the product available @ QTY = 1 through a distributor and compare please that price again to its competitors.

    it will look different.  

    i again recommend you contact these folks directly if interested, ask for volume pricing  and have a look at their modules and development kit, too - if you are wanting to make your own version of it, to reduce your own costs. 

    hope that helps. 

  • Hi,

    I wanted to transmit UHF RF signals over twisted pair cable (CAT6) and amplify them before connecting to antenna. I find this a cost effective solution than using a coaxial cable for long distances (~30m). Can you please comment on the drawbacks of this approach, if any.

    Also, in the above reply, I understand there are lot of elements to the cost other than just BOM. But only in case of UHF RFID reader solutions the difference between BOM cost and the actual price is not comparable with difference in other wired and wireless solutions. In the latter case, the difference is much lesser.
  • CAT5 and CAT6 cable has characteristic impedance of about 100 ohms and is good for up to about 250MHz. 

    Coaxial cable characteristic impedance of either 50 Ohms (radio applications) or 75 Ohms (TV applications), depending on the type and is pretty flat impedance wise over frequency compared to twisted pair. additionally, coax is usually good for much higher frequencies (up into high GHz ranges) because that is what it is designed for.  

    the way you describe using the twisted pair, perhaps you could think more along the lines of using that to extend your host control communication lines the distance you call out and using shorter coaxial cable, in the manner it is designed for. 

    this would be measurable, repeatable and realistic approach i think.