AWR1642: CLI_MAX_CMD was chaned in lab0002_short_range_radar for Toolbox v:2.4.6

Hitoshi Sugawara

Part Number: AWR1642

Hi Experts,

When CLI_MAX_CMD (cli.h) has been modified from 64 to 96, the asynchronous events from BSS have been changed after the sensorStart as follows:

(1) CLI_MAX_CMD == 64
sensorStart
RL_RF_AE_RUN_TIME_CALIB_REPORT_SB

(2) CLI_MAX_CMD == 96
sensorStart
RL_RF_AE_RUN_TIME_CALIB_REPORT_SB
RL_RF_AE_FRAME_TRIGGER_RDY_SB　(*)
RL_RF_AE_FRAME_END_SB　(*)

(*) is shown the change point.

Note: the number of registered commands is 64 for both (1) and (2).
It is strange that the number of the registered command is the same, but the events are changed.

Could you please let me know why it occurs?

Thank you very much in advance for your kind looking into the source code.
Best regards,
Hitoshi

over 5 years ago

0 Jitendra Gupta over 5 years ago

TI__Guru 68160 points

Hi Hitoshi,
Please provide us some time to do the same experiment at our end and get back to you.

Regards,
Jitendra

0 Hitoshi Sugawara over 5 years ago in reply to Jitendra Gupta

TI__Mastermind 18650 points

Hi Jitendra,

The question has come from my customer.

Today I had a test as follows:

Project files: C:\ti\mmwave_automotive_toolbox_2_4_7\labs\lab0002_short_range_radar

Target : AWR1642BOOST ES2.0

SDK : v2.0.0.4

One modification added.

CLI.H CLI_MAX_CMD 96 ( Original was 32 )

Make a hardware break point at the line 259 in mss_main.c.

I have confirmed that no hardware break occurs during the operation.

So, the change of the CLI_MAX_CMD does not cause any errors nor events change.

Could you please check it at your side too.

Best regards,

Hitoshi

0 Raghunandan Kamath over 5 years ago in reply to Hitoshi Sugawara

TI__Mastermind 22155 points

Sugawara-san,
I understand that you have asked the customer to check the code again due to some error.
Please re-open if you need further attention on this post.

-Thanks,
Raghu

Sensors

Sensors forum

AWR1642: CLI_MAX_CMD was chaned in lab0002_short_range_radar for Toolbox v:2.4.6