Part Number: TS5A4624
My Customer requested MUX/Switch for I2S communication like the below.
So, I will suggest TS3A44195 and TS5A4624.
Is it ok that TS3A44195 and TS5A4624 apply I2S communication for the follow?
Please check and reply.
We are glad that we were able to resolve this issue, and will now proceed to close this thread.
If you have further questions related to this thread, you may click "Ask a related question" below. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
In reply to Adam Torma:
I changed block for the below.
In reply to Charles Jeon:
The main difference between the TCA9546A and the TMUX1209 is how you give the switch the signal to change state. The TCA9546A requires a full I2C command from the microcontroller to change the switch state where the TMUX1209 simply uses a GPIO high or low signal to change state. Another main difference is the TCA9546A can communicate to all 4 ISPs simultaneously where the TMUX devices can only communicate one at a time.
Why did you choose to use the TMUX1104?
The lowest IC count solution is using 3x TMUX1209 devices.
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.