This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Part Number: TS3DV642
I'm currently prototyping a KVM with the TS3DV642 differential 2:1/1:2 MUX. It's intended to switch between two DisplayPort connector inputs out to one connector.
My question is, how should this connection be biased and ac coupled?
The datasheet specifies a need for around 1V bias conditions on the input, due to the FETs not being suitable for rapid negative swings. The following is their application note diagram for usage in a notebook embedded on the same board as the graphics card.
Above they have the convenience of making use of the DisplayPort biasing conditions before the graphics card ad couples the output (something a KVM can't leverage, as an external peripheral between source and sink connections!)
Bellow is the DisplayPort spec for the MainLink and AUX lines.
In my PCB design, I assumed that I could omit any ac coupling capacitors, and make use of the sink device biasing for MainLink connections (Vbias = 2V), and the source device biasing for AUX. This doesn't seem to work, and I don't have a +1GHz scope lying around to debug the board. I'm certain the differential signaling is properly laid out (intra/inter-pair skew is within spec, ground plane is unbroken, proper trace widths, etc..). I'm getting no signal out to the monitor (black screen on both inputs).
How would one properly bias this chip to use it as a KVM? Are there other issues that might make the implementation fail?
We are glad that we were able to resolve this issue, and will now proceed to close this thread.
If you have further questions related to this thread, you may click "Ask a related question" below. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
In reply to Jorge Llamas (SWAT):
In reply to Francisco Javier Zamudio:
Thanks for your reply. Here is my schematic. Note that this shows decoupling capacitors on the differential lines (ML & AUX) of the sink and source side. I have tried the design with and without these decoupling capacitors present. As stated above, for the attempt with no coupling capacitors, I was intending to rely on the biasing conditions of the source device for AUX, and sink device for ML guaranteed by the DisplayPort specification (2V).
In reply to Jamie Stepanian:
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with respect to these materials. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.