This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

SN74CB3Q3305: Ioff with Vin = 5.5V

Part Number: SN74CB3Q3305

Ioff is specified as 1 uA (MAX) with Vcc = 0V, Vi = 0V & Vo = 0 to 5.5V.  What is the voltage that needs to be applied to the control input, i.e. Vin?

Is Ioff still 1 uA (MAX) if Vin = 5.5V with Vcc = 0V, Vi = 0V & Vo = 0 to 5.5V?

  • Joseph,

    If Vcc = 0V, the voltage of the control pin should not effect the leakage spec on the I/O path, but I will need to place a device on my bench to confirm.

    Why are you using the switch for that you need to have low leakage on the I/O path when Vcc = 0V?

    Why did you choose the SN74CB3Q3305?

    Thank you,
    Adam
  • Adam,

    Thanks for the prompt response!

    I am using the switch to isolate signals from two power domains when either of the power domains are 0V.  I use one power domain (3.3V) for VCC, the signals connected to the I/O are 3.3V CMOS, and I use the other power domain (5V) to enable the switch through a 4.75k/10k voltage divider (the signals from the 5V domain are 3.3V CMOS).

    Thus, when the 5V power domain is off (i.e. 0V) while the 3.3V domain is valid, the SN74CB3Q3305 OE input is pulled low (through the 10k resistor) and the switch is disabled.  When the 3.3V domain is 0V while the 5V domain is valid, I have the following situation:  Vcc = 0V, Vin = 3.75V (worst-case), Vi = 0 V and Vo = 0 to 3.6V.  Hence, my question.

    My hope is the SN74CB3Q3305 will remain disabled in this situation and the Ioff spec is still applicable.  I also hope there is not a low impedance path to Vcc through the OE input (although since there is a 4.75k resistor between 5V and this input it should still be ok).

    Although I am not certain you will be able to view it, I have inserted a jpeg image of the relevant circuitry below.

    Regards,

    Joe

  • Adam,

    Have you had a chance to investigate this question any further?

    Regards,

    Joe

  • Joseph,

    I don't see any issues with the schematic you have provided.  Are you seeing any leakage issues on your board in the case you described?

    I have ordered samples and boards to test to see what happens to the leakage when Vcc=0V and there is a logic high voltage on the control logic pin.  I have not been able to get it on my bench yet to test but I do not predict to see any substantial leakage. 

    When do you need this test completed?

    Thank you,

    Adam

  • Adam,

    The board will be released for fabrication in ~2 weeks.  I intend to test for leakage when the boards are available, likely late July or early August.

    I was hoping to verify the part will perform as needed prior to releasing the design.  If it does not perform as needed I would delay the release and change the design.

    So if you had results (good or bad) prior to June 29 that would be great!  If that is not feasible, I will still release the design and take a chance that it will perform as needed.  And based upon your comments it does seem likely (but not guaranteed) that the switch will isolate the I/Os with Vcc=0V and a logic high on the control pin.

    Again thanks so much for your support!

    Regards,

    Joe

  • Joe,

    I have confirmed that the ioff spec is valid when Vcc = 0V Vin = 3.6 V that there is <1uA leakage between the I/O pins when 3.6V is applied.

    Thank you,
    Adam
  • Adam,

    Thank you for the confirmation!  Is there a chance on a future revision of the SN74CB3Q3305 datasheet that TI will include "Vin = 0 to 5.5V" in the Test Conditions for the Ioff parameter?

    I greatly appreciate the support and timely responses!!!

    Sincerely,

    Joe

  • Joseph,

    The chance is low that a future revision of the SN74CB3Q3305 will include an updated test conditions for Ioff parameter. However, the newer TMUX devices with the fail-safe logic will have this specified.

    Thank you,
    Adam
  • Adam,

    Comments noted and make sense, but I had to ask! Comment on the newer TMUX devices also noted.

    Thanks again for your support!

    Regards,
    Joe