Part Number: LMX9838
Hi,
Does the LMX9838 comply with the new RED directive and the EN 300 328 v2.1.1 ? If not, when do you plan to publish a report ?
Many thanks
Marc
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Part Number: LMX9838
Hi,
Does the LMX9838 comply with the new RED directive and the EN 300 328 v2.1.1 ? If not, when do you plan to publish a report ?
Many thanks
Marc
Hello Friedrich,
As I understand, the conformity with RED 2014/53/EU (or RTTE) is required only for final design. Components themselves are not subject to RED (or RTTE) conformity assessment.
As for EN 300 328 v2.1.1, this standard is fairly recent, so it may be months before certifying labs are ready to test it. As for certifying the LMX9838, this is an older device, and we are currently considering whether to certify it for EN 300 328 v2.1.1. Please check back with me in July this year, and I will have a better idea what our plans are.
James
Hello James,
Thanks, James.
Do you know which tests the LMX9838 failed? We are using the LMX9838 at a reduced power level (not maximum power output), so there is a possibility that we might pass EN 300 328 V2.1.1, unless the LMX9838 failed something like Receiver Blocking. Any information would help.
Regards,
Stephen
I downloaded the Declaration of Conformity for the CC2564MODA. It shows compliance with EN 300 328 V1.9.1 (R&TTE). Is there a more up-to-date DoC that shows compliance with EN 300 328 V2.1.1 (RED)?
Stephen,
Currently we are not meeting RX spurious emissions for CE and FCC. We are working to fix this, but I'm not sure on the timeline for when we will find a fix. However, we comply with RX spurious emissions for Japan.
As for the CC2564MODA, I think it is qualified for EN 300 328 v2.1.1. If you create a new post for the part with that question, the system will notify the applications engineer who supports that device.
Hi Anne,
The module now passes the EN 300 328 2.1.1 test. All the RF testing is completed and passes. Our next step is to do EMC testing and create the declaration of conformity. We expect to complete this in the next 2-4 weeks.
We did not make any changes to the module. We thoroughly reviewed our test procedure with the test house to ensure we sent the correct commands to the module in testing.
We are currently testing for EN 301 498-17 now. Once testing is completed, the units you have in inventory should be fully compliant.
Hi James,
Do you have any news about the tests & when production should re-start? We are quite in an urgency. Thanks
Anne
Hi James,
Is the testing complete now? Do you have CE DoC (updated for EN 300 328 2.1.1)?
Testing is complete and the LMX9838 passes EN 300 328 2.1.1.
We are currently preparing the declaration of conformity now that we have the test reports.
Hi James,
Thanks for the information.
When should production restart and when can we expect to have access to the LMX9838 again?
Anne
Hi Anne,
Sorry to intervene. We have now received DoC from our local TI FAE. Try to contact yours directly.
Cheers
Serguei
Thanks a lot James. I appreciate.
Do you have an idea when the module will again be available on the market?
Anne
Hi James,
That is disappointing news. Could you please confirm that there will be a last-time buy for existing customers as is normally the case with TI?
Thanks,
Glen
Sergei,
I'm not sure yet on those details. We will work with our sales channels regarding LTB and EOL.
Michael,
I've attached the EN 301 489-17 report here:
Michael,
I do not have a report for 489-1. The report for 489-17 is attached above.
Hi James,
Is it possible to buy this part now while we wait for the PCN and LTB schedule? We have heard nothing from our sales channels.
Thanks,
Glen
This forum has gone strangely silent. Are others here getting information regarding the status of this part through other channels?
Thanks,
Glen
Hi, Glen.
We have not been able to find information regarding the status of this part through other channels, and we have not been able to make a last time buy. So we modified our circuit board to use the SPBT3.0DP2 Bluetooth module instead of the LMX9838. Last week we passed all EMC testing with the SPBT3.0DP2 Bluetooth module.
Stephen
Hi Glen,
No news at all on our side. Strange way to treat customers!
Anne
Glen,
I am still told that TI will send a formal communication shortly. Unfortunately, I don't have a timeframe for when you will receive it.
For anyone looking to replace the LMX9838 module in their system, AmpedRF builds a certified module with the CC2564. The part number is BT53.
Hi James,
We were told on Sep 18 that "Official notification to all existing customers will be provided shortly.". For me, and I suspect many others here, two months is not "shortly". We have already selected a new BT module and are updating our designs, but this affects multiple products and will be a significant undertaking for us. We are trying to figure out ASAP whether we will be able to get more parts in the short-term to help us get through the transition. We cannot wait another two months for an answer.
Could you please provide an explanation of what is going on here? This part has been in limbo since June and we have not yet had a satisfactory response from TI.
Thanks,
Glen
Regarding LMX9838 radio certifications according to EN300328 it is tested for the extreme temperatures of 0 deg C and +40 deg C although the data sheet state that the module
operational temperature range is -40 to +85 deg C. What is the reason for the limited temperature range?
(The reason for asking is that our end product is specified to +50 deg C and unfortunately we cannot refer to your test reports.)
Let me know,
Michael