Range Estimation for Indoor and Outdoor Rev1_17.xlsm
The attached excel sheet helps to estimate a practical range estimation for indoor and outdoor radio links.
The outdoor is based upon Line-of-Sight (LOS). For the indoor estimation, construction materials can be selected that are between the Tx and Rx unit. The greater the attenuation of the combined material between the Tx and Rx unit, the shorter the distance.
This has been used a lot in TI seminars and is a helpful tool for calculating a realistic and conservative range expectation.
Latest version (1.17) has been updated to include:
Any feedback is welcomed.
--PS. Thank you for clicking Verify Answer below if this answered your question!
This is cool stuff!! Once I did a test with two CC2540EM (using dipole antennas) and I got a range about 260m outdoors on an open field. Your tool approximates 104m, am I missing something or did I just got lucky when doing the measurement? :) Picture attached.
Edit: After looking more closely on the graph and knowing that CC2540 has -93dBm in sensitivity (High-Gain mode), I see that my measurement is backed up by Friis equation. Really useful tool here!!
In reply to Joakim Lindh:
Thanks for the feedback.
Good to hear that the LOS results correlate.
This tool helps a lot especially when discussing indoor range and the impact of having a "dry wall" or "concrete" wall between the Tx and Rx units.
In reply to Richard Wallace:
I appreciate your work..
but can you tell me is your tool support cc2538 chip also ? becoz i am using cc2538 and zstack HA 1.20 so how can i use your tool ?
thanks & regards,
In reply to maneesh singh:
CC2538 is included in the Rev1_03 version.
How does this work? I tried entering the same inputs as Joakim, but I got #N/A as a result in the write protected cells
Edit: I got it working by using "." as a decimal point instead of ",".
What is the typical gain for iOS devices and how could I enter in such a value? How do I select different absorbtion materials?
In reply to Peter Borenstein:
There is no typical gain value for an iOS device since this depends on the specific design of the antenna. For a typical gain value, I would keep this at 0 dB for 2.4 GHz.
Your spreadsheet is very, very helpful. Would you mind sharing the source of your wall energy absorption numbers?
In reply to Jamie Nichol:
The source of the energy absorption numbers is from a report from the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with respect to these materials. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.