This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Yes, that is the 'just works' pairing scenario.
uint8 mitm = FALSE;
uint8 ioCap = GAPBOND_IO_CAP_NO_INPUT_NO_OUTPUT;
GAPBondMgr_SetParameter( GAPBOND_MITM_PROTECTION, sizeof ( uint8 ), &mitm );
GAPBondMgr_SetParameter( GAPBOND_IO_CAPABILITIES, sizeof ( uint8 ), &ioCap );
Thank you very much. It works well with following code.
uint32 passkey = 0; // passkey "000000"
uint8 pairMode = GAPBOND_PAIRING_MODE_WAIT_FOR_REQ;
uint8 mitm = FALSE;
uint8 ioCap = GAPBOND_IO_CAP_NO_INPUT_NO_OUTPUT;
uint8 bonding = TRUE;
GAPBondMgr_SetParameter( GAPBOND_DEFAULT_PASSCODE, sizeof ( uint32 ), &passkey );
GAPBondMgr_SetParameter( GAPBOND_PAIRING_MODE, sizeof ( uint8 ), &pairMode );
GAPBondMgr_SetParameter( GAPBOND_MITM_PROTECTION, sizeof ( uint8 ), &mitm );
GAPBondMgr_SetParameter( GAPBOND_IO_CAPABILITIES, sizeof ( uint8 ), &ioCap );
GAPBondMgr_SetParameter( GAPBOND_BONDING_ENABLED, sizeof ( uint8 ), &bonding );