WL1837MOD/WL1835MOD: CE Radio Test Reports

Sarah P

Part Number: WL1835MOD WL1837MOD
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: WL1837MOD, WL1831MOD

This post contains the CE Radio Test reports for WL1837MOD and WL1835MOD. For more information on the Radio Equipment Directive (RED), please see the WL18xxMOD Certification Reports wiki.

WL18MODGI - EN300328 v2.1.1: /cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/968/0020.ER741330A_5F00_R01_5F00_Teaxas_5F00_WL18MODGI.pdf
WL18MODGI - EN301893e v2.1.1: /cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/968/0160.ER741330B_5F00_R01_5F00_Teaxas_5F00_WL18MODGI.pdf
WL18MODGB - EN300328 v2.1.1: /cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/968/0535.ER741320_5F00_R01_5F00_Teaxas_5F00_WL18MODGB.pdf

over 6 years ago

0 tscheck over 6 years ago

TI__Mastermind 23525 points

Thanks

0 Meritxell Gimeno over 6 years ago in reply to tscheck

Prodigy 40 points

We provided the PDF files to the DEKRA certification centre and we are still waiting for the answer. However, we did not find the ITU designator in the provided information as they requested us. Let's see!

0 Dawn Shaffer over 6 years ago in reply to Meritxell Gimeno

Prodigy 10 points

The Test Reports show a partial report for EN 301 893 v.2.1.1 but that adds to a test report for EN 301 893 v.1.7.1. My test lab is not accepting the v1.7.1 report because they say that has to be v1.8.1. Do you have any test report showing compliance with v1.8.1? This is for WL1837MOD.
Thanks.

0 Rizwan Murji over 6 years ago in reply to Dawn Shaffer

TI__Genius 12260 points

Hi,

We consulted with our test lab. Please see below for the differences between v1.7.1 and v1.8.1:

EN 301893	V1.7.1	V1.8.1	Judgement
Carrier Frequencies	Same		No difference
Output power	Option 2: 20dBc burst power	Option 2: 30dBc burst power	Slight difference, This does not affect power measurement result.
Power Density	Same		No difference
Adaptivity	Undefined Interference period	60sec interference period	This has already been tested with 60sec period in 1.7.1 version
Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS)	Same		No difference
Occupied Bandwidth	Sweep time auto Peak Max Hold	Sweep time > 1sec RMS Max Hold	Slight difference This does not affect Occupied Bandwidth result.
Transmitter unwanted emissions within the 5 GHz RLAN bands	Same		No difference
Transmitter unwanted emissions outside the 5 GHz RLAN bands	CSE does not need to add antenna gain		No difference
Receiver Spurious Emission	RMS Max Hold	Time Domain Power Function	V1.7.1 is much more stringent

Based on this, no additional testing was done, delta testing was performed to become V2.1.1 compliant.

Thanks,

Riz

0 Edward Wilkolaski over 6 years ago in reply to Rizwan Murji

Prodigy 50 points

Hello all,
Any update on the WL1837MOD compliance to RED? I have stumbled onto some forums, but no specific DofC, which essentially what I am after.
Or perhaps a target date as to when the community might be able to expect compliance.

Many thanks
Ed

0 Rizwan Murji over 6 years ago in reply to Edward Wilkolaski

TI__Genius 12260 points

Hi Edward,

Please see attached.

8535.10 - DoC_WL18MODGI.pdf

Thanks,

Riz

0 Edward Wilkolaski over 6 years ago in reply to Rizwan Murji

Prodigy 50 points

Fantastic...thank you so much!

0 Frank Ambrosius over 6 years ago in reply to Rizwan Murji

Prodigy 120 points

Hi Riz,

Is this DoC also valid for the WL1835MOD (and thus the WL1831MOD)?

Thanks in advance.

Regards,

Frank

0 tscheck over 6 years ago in reply to Frank Ambrosius

TI__Mastermind 23525 points

Frank,

Here is the DoC for WL1835MOD. We are in the process of getting these and the test reports on ti.com in the respective product folder page. DoCs should be there soon.

Regards,

TravisWL1835MOD_DoC_SWRQ048.pdf

Wi-Fi

Wi-Fi forum

WL1837MOD/WL1835MOD: CE Radio Test Reports