The non-inverting, 4-switch buck-boost converter (TPS63xxx family) is an essential part of modern-day smart phones and tablets running from single-cell lithium batteries. Why is this so? Why is the buck-boost converter so important? What does a buck-boost converter actually do?
Fundamentally, a buck-boost converter uses 4 switches (MOSFETs) and 1 inductor to provide a regulated output voltage from an input voltage which varies above and below the desired output voltage. This is needed, for example, when taking a single-cell lithium battery (3-V to 4.2-V voltage range) and creating a 3.3-V rail. As opposed to a boost converter, which provides a regulated output voltage for only lower input voltages, or a buck converter, which provides a regulated output voltage for only higher input voltages, the buck-boost converter provides output voltage regulation for both conditions.
The main alternative to a buck-boost converter is using a two-stage conversion of the voltage—either a step-down followed by a step-up or a step-up followed by a step-down. This might be achieved by a step-down to 2.5V and then a boost to 3.3V or a boost to 5V and then a step-down to 3.3V. This approach is much less desirable as it takes up more space (two stages and two inductors are bigger than one) and it has a lower efficiency because the efficiency of each stage is multiplied together to get the total efficiency. The single inductor required and single stage conversion of the buck-boost saves space and increases efficiency. As shown in the figure at the top of this post, the efficiency is around 95% for most of the load current range and over 90% at full load.
The extremely small solution size and high efficiency demands of today’s smart and powerful electronics require buck-boost converters to generate the common 3.3-V rail. What are some of your requirements that a buck-boost converter fills?
Check out TI’s newest, smallest, and most efficient buck-boost converters: TPS63050 and TPS63025.
So far so good, but is it so much better then single inductor SEPIC ?
Thanks for reading!
I would say yes. These devices require only one inductor, so there is cost and size savings compared to a SEPIC. All are fully synchronous as well, which means higher efficiency. I have not seen a SEPIC design in a long time.
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.