Other Parts Discussed in Post: BQ25570

Energy harvesting – as most of us know it – has been around for thousands of years. Centuries ago, windmills were used to harvest wind energy. Solar water-heating systems have been in existence since the early 1900s. Since then, people have stretched their imagination to find ways to store and use “free” energy.

Most early energy-harvesting systems were industrial size. Today, the driving force behind the new wave of energy-harvesting devices is the desire to power wireless-sensor networks, or to extend battery life in mobile applications. This led to the development of a technique called microenergy harvesting. A microenergy-harvesting system continuously harvests microwatts to milliwatts of power from ambient sources, storing the energy for later use. Many electronic circuits such as microprocessor-based wireless-sensor nodes require only a few hundred microwatts to function. Thus, a system capable of harvesting small amounts of energy from its environment can practically power a small wireless-sensor node perpetually. Sounds simple, right? But is it too good to be true?

Early barriers to adoption

Large-scale adoption of microenergy-harvesting systems has been slow due to several factors.

First, for a long time, the biggest challenge was the availability of efficient harvester elements (such as solar cells and thermoelectric generators) that gave a higher power output in small form factors. Most harvesters are extremely inefficient converters of energy. For example, only about 20 percent of incident-light energy gets converted to electrical energy in a solar cell.

Second, the high quiescent power consumption of the electronic systems itself was a deal breaker. For example, a system that consumes milliamps of current in its sleep state will create a negative energy balance (more out than in), leading to more reliance on, and eventual depletion of, the system’s battery.

New horizons

These challenges were preventing widespread use of microenergy harvesting. However, now there is serious hope.

With new advances in integrated circuit (IC) ultra-low-power technology, system designers are now able to design systems that consume less power overall, thus making energy-harvesting systems more practical. However, the standby current consumption will still dictate the run time of the battery when harvesting is not possible. In this case, ultra-low standby current will extend the run time of the battery. For example, the TI bq25505 energy-harvester IC has a standby current consumption of 5nA – which is practically nothing. Other industry chips have standby current consumption 300 times more.

The operating-current consumption while harvesting is also critical. Very low operating-current consumption while harvesting means that the majority of the power from the harvester is transferred to the battery. For example, the TI bq25570 has an operating-current consumption of 488nA while other industry ICs have operating currents greater than 5mA – a greater than 10 times increase. Similarly, TI’s ultra-low-power MSP430FR5969 FRAM microcontroller (MCU) has optimized low-power modes that can be creatively used to design ultra-low-power MCU-based systems.

 Harvester providers are taking giant strides in producing harvesters that now give more output for their size. For example, some dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) can now output 20-25µW/cm2 of power at a mere 200Lux (typical office lighting is 600-1,500Lux), thus making microenergy harvesting more attractive. This is more than sufficient to run a small well-designed sensor node whose average power requirement is 60-100µW.

Other requirements

There are other factors that are also critical to the success of an energy-harvesting system.

First is the duty cycle of system – this is decided by the duration that the system is active versus the duration it is sleeping. Total system-power consumption is dominated by sleep current. Hence, by keeping the sleep current as low as possible, extended run times are achievable.

Second, the system should have advanced features such as an maximum power-point tracking (MPPT) feature. The TI bq25570 IC supports MPPT, which is a way to optimize the power extraction from the harvester.

 Third, the system should be capable of intelligently managing the power transfer from the harvester to the battery. Features such as battery management, battery under-voltage and over-voltage protection make the system more robust and safe.

The future

Indoor light harvesting will lead the way to more wide-scale adoption of microenergy harvesting. The applications are potentially huge: home and factory automation, security systems, smart buildings, and medical and fitness applications. TI engineers are ready to assist you in your next innovative design. The question is, are you ready?

Additional resources:

  • TIDA-00041-  Energy Harvesting Reference Design Solution for Ultra Low Power Boost Converter IC
  • TIDA-00242- Solar Power Energy Harvester Reference Design Using Super Cap
  • TIDA-00100- Indoor Light Energy Harvesting Reference Design for Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) Beacon Subsystem