<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>A bone of contention: ENOB or effective resolution?</title><link>/blogs_/archives/b/precisionhub/posts/a-bone-of-contention-enob-or-effective-resolution</link><description>This technical article was updated on July 23, 2020.
 
As you might know, both ENOB (&amp;ldquo;Effective Number of Bits&amp;rdquo;) and effective resolution are parameters that relate to an ADC&amp;rsquo;s resolution. Understanding how they differ, and deciding ...</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><item><title>RE: A bone of contention: ENOB or effective resolution?</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/archives/b/precisionhub/posts/a-bone-of-contention-enob-or-effective-resolution</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2018 20:07:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:f7de65e2-4c2a-403d-8a91-db36d21f6e15</guid><dc:creator>Jay Abel</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;In SBAS607B, Revised September 2016, the datasheet for the ADS127L01 gives a formula for ENOB that is flatly wrong, overstating ENOB by 1.79 bits. &amp;nbsp;The definition given in the article above as equation (6) is correct, and agrees with the IEEE standard definition. &amp;nbsp;The definition given in the data sheet seems to have dropped from the sky, a gift from the technical marketing department to the sales force. &amp;nbsp;Calling a a daisy a rose doesn&amp;#39;t make it one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; What really puzzles me is that the specifications for the ADS127L01 are very good all by themselves, and the substitution of &amp;quot;Effective Resolution&amp;quot; as defined above but calling it ENOB is at best confusing and misleading at worst.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/aggbug?PostID=666185&amp;AppID=930&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: A bone of contention: ENOB or effective resolution?</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/archives/b/precisionhub/posts/a-bone-of-contention-enob-or-effective-resolution</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 19:58:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:f7de65e2-4c2a-403d-8a91-db36d21f6e15</guid><dc:creator>Ahmet Cetin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello I watch the webinar on EDN , Thank you for your post.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/aggbug?PostID=666185&amp;AppID=930&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>