<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Part 2 - A voltage reference duel of duals</title><link>/blogs_/archives/b/precisionhub/posts/part-2-a-voltage-reference-duel-of-duals</link><description>In my previous post, we talked about three topologies for generating two high-accuracy voltage reference outputs . Today, we’ll compare the performance of these solutions from three perspectives: total error, drift tracking and matching between outputs</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><item><title>RE: Part 2 - A voltage reference duel of duals</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/archives/b/precisionhub/posts/part-2-a-voltage-reference-duel-of-duals</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:31:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:42c9f6d3-341c-4b4d-987a-48df25ce6907</guid><dc:creator>Bonnie Baker  - WEBENCH Design Center</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Ying,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Excellent article. Clear and quickly to the point. I look forward to the next installment. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/aggbug?PostID=666434&amp;AppID=930&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>