<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Put Gain Up Front—waxing philosophical</title><link>/blogs_/archives/b/thesignal/posts/put-gain-up-front-waxing-philosophical</link><description>Low noise, low offset voltage, low drift—all the precision low-level signal processing goals get easier when you put voltage gain up front in the signal chain. 
 It’s a simple concept. The error in the second stage is divided by the gain of the first</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><item><title>RE: Put Gain Up Front—waxing philosophical</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/archives/b/thesignal/posts/put-gain-up-front-waxing-philosophical</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 19:29:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:1cdd4466-0125-41e3-b84a-a273da70374d</guid><dc:creator>Bruce Trump</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;MaxO-- For low noise, consider the INA163 or INA103. For excellent CMRR over frequency consider the INA826. The selection of an instrumentation amp (or an op amp, for that matter) can depend on many factors specific to the application. It&amp;#39;s probably best to get into your application details in a forum post. --Bruce&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/aggbug?PostID=664109&amp;AppID=864&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Put Gain Up Front—waxing philosophical</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/archives/b/thesignal/posts/put-gain-up-front-waxing-philosophical</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 18:08:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:1cdd4466-0125-41e3-b84a-a273da70374d</guid><dc:creator>MaxO</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;This all make sense, now, what is the best precision InAmp out there? Let say you don&amp;#39;t care about voltage offset since there is filtering circuitry later on, and power consumption is not a problem, so, if you only care about low-noise and high CMRR. I&amp;#39;ve been using the INA333, does anybody has another favorite?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/aggbug?PostID=664109&amp;AppID=864&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Put Gain Up Front—waxing philosophical</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/archives/b/thesignal/posts/put-gain-up-front-waxing-philosophical</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:56:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:1cdd4466-0125-41e3-b84a-a273da70374d</guid><dc:creator>Ken Dillinger</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;I was dinged on this concept during an interview. I only knew that it is beneficial to have a higher gain block in front of a cascaded signal chain, but I did not know the technical reason why and I certainly did not know the math behind it. After the interview I scoured the web and now I know it as Frii&amp;#39;s Formula.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/aggbug?PostID=664109&amp;AppID=864&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>