<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Comparators—what’s all the chatter?</title><link>/blogs_/archives/b/thesignal/posts/comparators-what-s-all-the-chatter</link><description>It’s an easy concept—the inputs compare two voltages. The output is high or low. So, why all the chatter through the transition? 
 This effect usually occurs with slow changes through the transition voltage. Often it’s because the input signals have</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><item><title>RE: Comparators—what’s all the chatter?</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/archives/b/thesignal/posts/comparators-what-s-all-the-chatter</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2021 15:48:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:4fa741cc-a014-47de-ab88-015ff627af78</guid><dc:creator>Az-eddine Haida</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/aggbug?PostID=664136&amp;AppID=864&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Comparators—what’s all the chatter?</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/archives/b/thesignal/posts/comparators-what-s-all-the-chatter</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 00:28:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:4fa741cc-a014-47de-ab88-015ff627af78</guid><dc:creator>Fabio Barone</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Bruce,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;good read. &amp;nbsp;If I may, I have one suggestion for reducing chatter for comparators with slowly moving signals: &amp;nbsp;place a capacitor in **parallel** with R2 . &amp;nbsp;You mentioned having one in series with R2, but I have found that placing a cap in series with the feedback (hysteresis) resistor is very effective in eliminating chatter. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Sometimes an additional resistor in series with the new capacitor is also needed. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By having the capacitor as a parallel path to R2, one can think of the feedback as having two parts: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. a DC part (set by R2 and R1 in the circuit above), and &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. an AC part, which would be set by the capacitor, &amp;nbsp;its series R (if any), &amp;nbsp;and R1. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The AC part provides a high positive feedback, which forces the output to change rapidly, and avoids chatter during the transition. &amp;nbsp;Once the output transition is done, the DC part of the feedback sets the new threshold for the opposite transition. &amp;nbsp;Suggest set the time constant of the AC part as being 2 to 5 times the time delay of the comparator (time from input crossing threshold to output reaching 90% of of final value), but of course, there is a trade off since this time constant would also set a lower limit on how quickly the compartor can then react to an input swapping over to the opposite state.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Loking forward to more posts on analog stuff!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/aggbug?PostID=664136&amp;AppID=864&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Comparators—what’s all the chatter?</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/archives/b/thesignal/posts/comparators-what-s-all-the-chatter</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 19:20:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:4fa741cc-a014-47de-ab88-015ff627af78</guid><dc:creator>Bruce Trump</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Ken-- The upper and lower threshold are shifted by the offset voltage so the hysteresis band remains the same. -- Bruce&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/aggbug?PostID=664136&amp;AppID=864&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Comparators—what’s all the chatter?</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/archives/b/thesignal/posts/comparators-what-s-all-the-chatter</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 18:31:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:4fa741cc-a014-47de-ab88-015ff627af78</guid><dc:creator>Ken Dillinger</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;What about the offset voltage? Vt + Vos + Vhys would be the trip point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/aggbug?PostID=664136&amp;AppID=864&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Comparators—what’s all the chatter?</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/archives/b/thesignal/posts/comparators-what-s-all-the-chatter</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:19:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:4fa741cc-a014-47de-ab88-015ff627af78</guid><dc:creator>Bruce Trump</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;David--In my experience, a slowly rising input eventually causes a sudden onset of chatter. Chatter begets more chatter due to self-created noise. As the ramp continues, it dies out more gradually. With appropriate hysteresis, it&amp;#39;s clean. I was deliberately vague on the specifics of ramp rate. It depends so much on the speed of the comparator and magnitude of the noise in your inputs. kHz. == Bruce&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/aggbug?PostID=664136&amp;AppID=864&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Comparators—what’s all the chatter?</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/archives/b/thesignal/posts/comparators-what-s-all-the-chatter</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:25:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:4fa741cc-a014-47de-ab88-015ff627af78</guid><dc:creator>David Escandon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Bruce. In your experience, is &amp;quot;chatter&amp;quot; a normally distributed effect? Also, by fast moving ramp rates are you thinking kilohertz or more? Just wondering. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/aggbug?PostID=664136&amp;AppID=864&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>