<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Handy Gadgets and Resistor Divider Calculations</title><link>/blogs_/archives/b/thesignal/posts/handy-gadgets</link><description>Handy gadgets make our engineering life easier—the little special purpose computer programs or spreadsheets that you might find or create yourself. 
 Back in the old days, engineers used nomographs. These are graphical aids that solve common multivariable</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><item><title>RE: Handy Gadgets and Resistor Divider Calculations</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/archives/b/thesignal/posts/handy-gadgets</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 13:13:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:168236bc-bbcc-440e-b472-124fd26f7c10</guid><dc:creator>Bruce Trump</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds useful, Percy. Note that the Excel sheet provided above has cells that calculate the nearest 1% (R96) resistor value. For example, cell M8 calculates the nearest standard 1% resistor for the value of cell F7. The formula in M8 can be easily copied and used for the types of calculations you&amp;#39;ve done. -- Bruce&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/aggbug?PostID=664603&amp;AppID=864&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Handy Gadgets and Resistor Divider Calculations</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/archives/b/thesignal/posts/handy-gadgets</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 12:09:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:168236bc-bbcc-440e-b472-124fd26f7c10</guid><dc:creator>Percy Williams</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;This is very simple:This is for a potential divider where only preferred values can be used. I did an Excel spreadsheet where cells in the first row were populated with preferred resistor values. &amp;nbsp;Cells in the first column were likewise populated. &amp;nbsp;The other cells had a formula in for calculating the division ratio from these resistors. It was then an easy matter to scan the table and find the combination that gave the best result required. &amp;nbsp;I did a similar one for series combinations and for parallel combinations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/aggbug?PostID=664603&amp;AppID=864&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Handy Gadgets and Resistor Divider Calculations</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/archives/b/thesignal/posts/handy-gadgets</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 15:06:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:168236bc-bbcc-440e-b472-124fd26f7c10</guid><dc:creator>Eric Fletcher</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;55 years ago, when a junior engineering student I was using my slide rule inherited from my grand-father (an artillery officer !) to&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;compute R/2R , R/10R, Pi/Ratio of Pi, etc...networks ...........Sorry, it took me 20 years to get a TI handheld calculator to execute the&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;same computations,! By the way, I was so good, that I executed &amp;nbsp;60% of the computations by head ( and still to day !!! )&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/aggbug?PostID=664603&amp;AppID=864&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Handy Gadgets and Resistor Divider Calculations</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/archives/b/thesignal/posts/handy-gadgets</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:44:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:168236bc-bbcc-440e-b472-124fd26f7c10</guid><dc:creator>Bruce Trump</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Bravo, Alan. You&amp;#39;re a serious gadget man! &amp;nbsp;-- &amp;nbsp;Bruce&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/aggbug?PostID=664603&amp;AppID=864&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Handy Gadgets and Resistor Divider Calculations</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/archives/b/thesignal/posts/handy-gadgets</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:23:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:168236bc-bbcc-440e-b472-124fd26f7c10</guid><dc:creator>Alan Campbell</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;When it comes to Excel, I&amp;#39;m working my way through creating a series of spreadsheets. I&amp;#39;m getting my head around I &amp;amp; Q demodulation, along with DSP.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve started with a series of sinewaves, assorted magnitudes, rounded as 14-bit integers. 4096 samples along with a FFT (and windowed FFT!) makes a big spreadsheet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My second sheet takes the samples from the 1st, splits into I &amp;amp; Q, and has a very basic FIR. FFT results too!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Third spreadheet [in progress]: Hilbert transform!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Final spreadsheet: Sum and difference of I &amp;amp; transformed Q: hopefully showing upper vs lower sidebands of original mix of sinewaves...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/aggbug?PostID=664603&amp;AppID=864&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>