“Why is Ethernet so power-hungry?” is a common question. A typical active power 10/100 Mbps Ethernet physical layer (PHY) transceiver consumes 110mW to over 300mW, while a 10/100/1000Mbps Gigabit Ethernet PHY consumes 450mW to over 1,000mW of power. It’s not uncommon for an Ethernet PHY to be one of the single largest consumers of power on a board, and to be a significant factor when evaluating the heat budget of an enclosed system. There are various low-power modes conceptualized for Ethernet that reduce overall system power. In this post, I’ll discuss two popular power-saving features that enable cooler systems and lower power costs.
Energy-efficient Ethernet (EEE), as defined in Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.3az, is a PHY and media access control (MAC) standard that eliminates idle signaling during times of low channel utilization. As Figure 1 shows, EEE enables periods of low power where the transmitter is disabled during “quiet” times, broken by short refresh periods. These quiet times save power by eliminating the wasteful practice of continuously transmitting idle symbols across an active link, while the refresh periods ensure that the link presence and timing inside of and between the PHYs remains in a valid state.
Figure 1: EEE state flow
EEE mode appears transparent to higher layers, as the MAC signals for the PHY exit the EEE state when data is present to transmit. The PHY will exit low-power mode and transmit idle code groups to bring the far-end device out of low power.
For more detailed information about EEE, see the application note, “DP83822 Energy Efficient Ethernet IEEE 802.3az.”
Wake-on-LAN (WoL) keeps the Ethernet PHY in an active state, but saves power by enabling the system’s back-end components (processor, microcontroller (MCU), application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) or other components) to power down selectively. These back-end components wake up when the Ethernet PHY receives a known “magic” packet.
The WoL scheme enables engineers to save on overall system power while keeping the Ethernet transceiver awake when the system has well-defined stimuli that should trigger wake ups. There are a few different ways to implement WoL, discussed in the application note, “DP83822 Wake-On-LAN.”
Figure 2 shows a magic pattern scheme for which the Ethernet PHY will monitor ingress packets before signaling a wake up.
Figure 2: WoL magic packet example
Now that you know of two different ways to save power using the Ethernet PHY, which scheme do you plan to implement within your system? Log in to leave a comment, or join the TI E2E™ Community Ethernet forum.
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.