<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://e2e.ti.com/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>What you need to know about transimpedance amplifiers – part 1</title><link>/blogs_/b/analogwire/posts/what-you-need-to-know-about-transimpedance-amplifiers-part-1</link><description>Transimpedance amplifiers (TIAs) act as front-end amplifiers for optical sensors such as photodiodes, converting the sensor&amp;rsquo;s output current to a voltage. TIAs are conceptually simple: a feedback resistor (RF) across an operational amplifier (o...</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 11</generator><item><title>RE: What you need to know about transimpedance amplifiers – part 1</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/b/analogwire/posts/what-you-need-to-know-about-transimpedance-amplifiers-part-1</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2021 16:04:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:32ffa1c9-2475-4d8f-a423-e7bd0342b30d</guid><dc:creator>Michael Steffes</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;This post is referred to by the latest decomp parts for transimpedance design - it gives the correct Cf solution for a butterworth design including the 0.707 term. The added resources though. The first is the the one by Xavier Ramus from my original work and I am sure it is correct. However the 4th reference on choosing the best amplifier by Hooman repeats a common error in setting the Cf - essentially targeting the feedback pole at the Fo frequency - this will give you a closed loop Q=1 peaking, where as the correct equation gives you butterworth. Might want to edit that older app note by Hooman or remove it. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/aggbug?PostID=668635&amp;AppID=325&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: What you need to know about transimpedance amplifiers – part 1</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/b/analogwire/posts/what-you-need-to-know-about-transimpedance-amplifiers-part-1</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 15:31:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:32ffa1c9-2475-4d8f-a423-e7bd0342b30d</guid><dc:creator>aditya chowdary tella</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could you explain the following &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Why the source resistance is not considered while calculating the loop gain or Noise gain&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Can the differential input capacitance be neglected due to virtual ground behavior as explained in your previous post ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/aggbug?PostID=668635&amp;AppID=325&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>