As automotive camera technology advances with higher resolutions, dynamic ranges and frame rates, power-supply architectures need tailoring to the specific use-case requirements. In this article, I’ll review three strategies you can use to power your automotive camera module:
The focus in this article is on small-form-factor camera modules that don’t include any data processing, and output raw video data to a separate electronic control unit. These modules are often found in surround-view, driver-monitoring and mirror-replacement systems and receive a pre-regulated supply voltage over the same coaxial cable used for video data output.
How much power do you need for a camera module?
The first step when designing the power portion of a camera module is a brief calculation of the power budget for each rail. This, along with the voltage provided over power-over-coax (PoC), is important in selecting the power strategy.
A camera sensor and external circuitry require a current draw that may vary widely across different sensors and any additional external devices. Usually, the lower imager rails (1.2 V and 1.8 V in Figure 1) require the most current, while the largest supply voltage (2.9 V for the imager) requires the least. Because the 2.9-V rail pertains to the analog supply of the imager – and ultimately, its performance with regard to image quality – selecting a supply will require careful consideration, as the rail requires a clean supply with minimal noise. The included FPD-Link device, along with any form of supervisors or sequencers, will also pull from this power budget.
Figure 1: Calculating the power budget for each rail
One might suggest using a low-dropout regulator (LDO) for every supply considering its excellent noise performance. However, that is not feasible when designing with a limited power budget. Additionally, increasing current will stress connectors and cables and increase self heating of the camera, which may worsen performance.
As shown in the example calculation in Table 1, the current requirements for camera modules are generally determined by the sensor and FPD-Link device included in the system. In this example, the imager rails are 1.2 V, 1.8 V and 2.9 V. The FPD-Link device shares the same 1.8-V rail. The required currents for normal operation are highlighted in red.
Table 1: An example calculation with imager rails at 1.2 V, 1.8 V and 2.9 V
In this example, the PoC supply over the coaxial cable is first stepped down to 3.3 V, which then supplies the rest of the system on the camera module. The 2.9-V sensor analog rail is tied directly to an LDO output, while the other supplies are tied to a step-down (buck) converter. The 1.8-V rail supplies both the DS90UB953-Q1 supply, and the interface supply of the imager. Since the current consumed by the DS90UB953-Q1 serializer is predominantly greater than the imager interface supply, the 1.8-V current provided to the imager can be considered as negligible. The imager 2.9-V analog rail requires 63 mA, the DS90UB953-Q1 serializer 1.8-V rail requires 225 mA and the imager digital 1.2-V rail requires 388 mA. Assuming 100% efficiency to simplify calculations with the previous values, it is calculated that the 3.3-V supply will require 327 mA to successfully power the 1.2-V, 1.8-V, and 2.9-V rails.
Because the input and output voltages, output current requirements, and total wattage consumption are known, the input current can be calculated with:
(PoC Voltage)*(Current required) = 3.3-V * 327 mA
For a PoC Voltage of 12-V, the ECU would source 90 mA.
In some situations, the PoC voltage is fixed from the ECU, therefore it’s important to understand if the chosen PoC cable and network is adequate in supplying the required current for the power goal. For a 2-W camera module requirement, a fixed 5-V supply would source 400 mA, while a 12-V supply would source 166 mA.
For larger PoC cable lengths, a large PoC voltage should be chosen to ensure minimal IR drop across the cable. PoC current will create a voltage drop across the cabling, ferrite beads, inductors, and any series resistance and will reduce voltage headroom impacting camera module regulator performance. In the case that the PoC voltage value is left to the designer, cable specifications generally dictate the amount of current that the network can provide, which will drive the voltage requirement of the network.
Three power architectures for automotive camera modules
Table 2 compares the advantages and disadvantages of the three different power architectures.
Table 2: Comparing camera module power architectures
When designing for automotive applications, there are a few considerations that will limit your power design choices. Important system-level specifications include:
Printed circuit board constraints
The imager in Figure 2 uses a Mobile Industry Processor Interface (MIPI) Camera Serial Interface (CSI-2), with nets highlighted to display the controlled impedance traces that connect the FPD-Link device to the imager. CSI-2 nets of the imager are brought out through vias and routed mid-layer (highlighted).
The via array poses some limitations to a smaller form factor, as they limit the area of where the power devices can be placed. To minimize coupling, especially around switch-mode power supplies or signal nets, it’s important that CSI-2 nets are properly distanced, shielded and have no overlap from other nets on adjacent layers.
Figure 2: Example layout of the DS90UB953-Q1 with an imager
Choose your power architecture
The right power architecture will vary based on your design requirements. These reference designs will help you see the specifications in greater detail and make your design simpler when you’re ready to get started:
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.