Now coming out of its infancy, the residential energy storage market is on the brink of explosive growth. In the U.S. alone, this market has had 232% year-on-year growth since the first quarter of 2018, with behind-the-meter storage making up 46% of deployments in the first quarter of 2019. Today, the residential energy storage sector is comparatively smaller than utility-scale deployments. The global residential energy storage market is expected to grow from an estimated $6 billion in 2019 to $17.5 billion by 2024; that’s a compound annual growth rate of 22.88% (according to the latest Wood Mackenzie U.S. Energy Storage Monitor (paywall).
Companies worldwide have started to see the future growth potential for energy storage, with new players from a range of backgrounds and expertise entering the market.
A crucial design challenge for energy storage developers to overcome is system integration to ultimately enable lower system costs, smaller form factors and reduced number of components and subsystems. In the context of energy storage, system integration means combining two separate paths to charge and discharge the battery into one by moving from unidirectional to bidirectional power conversion stages.
The shift to bidirectional power factor correction (PFC) and inverter power stages
The rise of the energy storage market can be attributed to methods and innovations that have enabled designers to overcome major challenges like system integration and cost. Until newer technology and solutions became available, unidirectional AC/DC, DC/AC, and DC/DC power stages have been the conventional system choice. Figure 1 illustrates a typical system with unidirectional power factor correction (PFC) and inverter power stages.
Figure 1: Grid-level system diagram with unidirectional PFC and inverter stages
This unidirectional approach presents an inevitable barrier to achieving system integration, however. The system will require more power stages, more components and more controllers, ultimately leading to a higher system cost. By nature, energy flows bidirectionally with respect to a battery, either flowing into the battery to charge or flowing out of the battery to discharge. If it were possible to condense these power stages, you could reduce the number of components, modules and subsystems and ultimately achieve a lower system bill-of-materials (BOM) cost.
A potential solution to these challenges is bidirectional functionality for AC/DC, DC/AC and DC/DC power-conversion stages. To further increase system integration, system BOM and form-factor reductions, the landscape of grid systems that involve energy storage is moving toward bidirectional power conversion blocks like those shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2: Grid-level system diagram with bidirectional PFC and inverter stage
This bidirectional implementation is showcased in the latest reference design featuring C2000™ MCUs. The bidirectional interleaved CCM totem pole bridgeless PFC with GaN reference design is based on the TMS320F280049C real-time controller family.
Hybrid inverters
Another market trend that has risen due to the desire to further increase system integration in the energy storage market is the deployment of hybrid or storage-ready inverters. An inverter is simply a function that converts DC power to AC power. But what happens when there are multiple DC sources? In a grid infrastructure setting, a conventional inverter will invert DC power from solar panels into AC power. A hybrid inverter complements a solar inverter system with energy storage so that the same inverter can invert DC power from either the solar photovoltaic (PV) panels or the charged battery. In fact, this is one way solar PV manufacturers are using energy storage to grow their business and stay ahead of the market. Energy storage solutions are inevitable, and hybrid inverters are the key to a risk-free and future-proof solution for solar system designers.
The need and solution
Bidirectional energy storage solutions, including hybrid inverters, require high power efficiency, performance and device compactness. These requirements in turn require the implementation of more advanced power topologies, lower total harmonic distortion, faster transient responses, a higher control-loop frequency and higher pulse-width modulation (PWM) frequencies, which are only achievable through real-time controllers that support more sophisticated PWM schemes, high-resolution PWMs, high analog-to-digital converter (ADC) speeds and high processing power.
The C2000 portfolio of real-time controllers offers these advantages, not only for energy storage systems, but for many digital power applications:
Table 1 lists reference designs featuring C2000 devices that incorporate the bidirectional implementation of AC/DC and DC/DC power stages, as well as advanced and complex PWM schemes.
Energy storage system function
Reference design name
PFC/inverter
Bidirectional High-Density GaN CCM Totem Pole PFC Using C2000 MCU
Three-Level, Three-Phase SiC AC-to-DC Converter Reference Design
DC/DC
Bidirectional CLLLC Resonant Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Reference Design for HEV/EV Onboard Charger
2kW, 48V to 400V, >93% Efficiency, Isolated Bidirectional DC/DC Converter Reference Design for UPS
Table 1: TI reference designs for energy storage systems
Energy storage solutions are on the rise and grid infrastructure designers are investing to keep up with their competitors and the market. Bidirectional power conversion blocks and hybrid inverter solutions allow for reduced components, fewer modules and subsystems, and ultimately a lower system BOM cost. C2000™ devices for real-time control are purpose-built to meet designers’ needs and help continue the growth of the energy storage market.
Additional resources