Engineering magic: Touch through thick glass with LEDs and LCD

Other Parts Discussed in Post: TIDA-00494, TIDA-00464

Not impressed with the magic trick revealed in the previous post? Then check out this one: We kept working on our touch-through-glass application and managed to improve it. Using an MSP430™ microcontroller (MCU) with CapTIvate™ technology (the MSP430FR2633), we were able to control light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and a liquid crystal display (LCD) upon button presses, beyond just sensing the buttons as we did with the Low-Power Touch Through Glass Reference Design (TIDA-00343). Figure 1 is a block diagram of the Touch Through Glass with LCD Reference Design (TIDA-00494).

Figure 1: Block diagram for the LCD reference design (TIDA-00494)

If you’ll recall from my previous post, process plant operators need to interact daily with a keypad for programming functions. The keypad is encapsulated in an explosive-proof screw-on metallic enclosure with thick glass windows, with local readouts through an LCD (see Figure 2).

Figure 2: TIDA-00494 Touch through Glass reference design

Factory automation and process control designers struggle to find ways for operators to interact with these explosion-proof field transmitters without having to open the enclosures, which can be time-consuming.

Let’s think about already existing technologies that could solve this issue:

  • Infrared technology detects button presses through light changes when a finger approaches the sensor. However, this technology is unreliable in industrial environments. If the glass is caked with oil or dust, a spot on the button area could cause a false touch detection.
  • A magnetic solution would entail having a magnetic switch, which closes when it detects a strong magnetic field nearby. But the user would have to have a magnetic pen on hand at all times to generate the magnetic field.

Capacitive technology solves these problems; in addition, the number of buttons does not affect the cost of the application, since adding buttons means adding only extra copper to the PCB.

We have proved the robustness of CapTIvate™ technology by performing many tests, including touch with bare fingers and touch with gloves. We have also tried to recreate false-touch situations. In each test, we took 1,000 samples while pressing a button and 1,000 samples without performing any action. Then we calculated the mean and standard deviation of each event to estimate the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and crosstalk among the buttons.

To ensure that the probability of a button being touched is equal to 99.73%, the SNR must be greater than 9.5dB. To ensure that a button press does not influence the nearby button, the crosstalk should be as well greater than 9.5dB. The test results meet this threshold; see Figure 3.

Figure 3: Touch & crosstalk tests

Capacitive technology has its own limitations (which I mentioned in my previous post) related to the air gap needed between the glass and the PCB, which should be as small as possible.

The reference design can detect a touch event with or without gloves, even though the electrode board has an air gap of as much as 2mm from the 10mm-thick glass and gives feedback through LEDs and an LCD with only one chip.

Additional resources: