Control-loop gain, which can be plotted in a Bode plot, is a good indicator of system stability. Control-loop bandwidth also directly affects transient response performance.
DCAP™ or DCAP2™ /DCAP3™ regulators (which I’ll refer to as DCAPx in this discussion) became popular for their simplicity. The DCAPx poses a challenge for engineers when it comes to measuring control-loop gain. It is tempting to measure the Bode plot by breaking the loop at the top of the feedback resistor divider as shown in Figure 1. This is proper for traditional control architectures where there is only one output feedback path and the feedback goes through the compensator before pulse-width modulation (PWM).
Figure 1: Conventional control-loop gain setup
Rather than the traditional voltage-mode or current-mode control architectures, the DCAPx control system has two direct output feedback paths: one through the feedback resistor divider network, and the other through the direct current resistance (DCR) injection circuit, as shown in Figure 2. The DCAPx control system does not have a high DC gain error amplifier like the traditional type II or type III compensator. PWM pulses are modulated at the FB pin. The FB pin is usually the negative input of the error amplifier for traditional control architectures. For DCAP, DCAP2, DCAP3, it is one of the input of the PWM comparator.
Figure 2: Block diagram of a DCAP regulator with a DCR injection circuit
By leaving one of the feedback path outputs of the measurement, the Bode plot measured using the setup shown in Figure 1 does not directly correlate to the transient response. To properly measure the loop-gain Bode plot, the loop breaking point should include both feedback paths, as shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Proper DCAP regulator control-loop Bode plot measurement setup
For DCAPx regulators, the PWM modulation gain is determined by the falling slope of the triangular waveform formed at the FB pin by the DCR injection network and output-capacitor equivalent series resistance (ESR). The parasitic inductance and resistance along the disturbance-injection cable and noise coupled into the wires would tort the triangular waveform at the FB pin, thus rendering a different PWM modulation gain than that of the regulator without the test setup.
To preserve accuracy, a bypassing capacitor, Cpass, is added in parallel to the 20Ω resistor. The 20Ω resistor and Cpass form a high-pass filter. The corner frequency is set at lower than half of the converter switching frequency so that the triangular waveform at the FB pin during the testing remains similar to that during normal operation.
I used 0.22µF for a converter switching at 500KHz. For most applications, the proper Cpass value is from 0.1µF to 0.47µF. To minimize the effect on the system, the DCR injection capacitor, Cp, should be less than one-tenth of Cpass, as shown in Figure 3.
Figure 4 shows the Bode plot measurement results using the test setup shown in Figure 3. Cpass = 0.22µF and Cp = 22nF. By adjusting Rp and Cff, crossover frequency is set at one-sixth the switching frequency with a phase margin of 66 degrees. I conducted these experiments with the reference design, Step-down converter for powering rails in Altera Arria V FPGA (PMP8824).
Figure 4: Bode plots measured with the proposed test setup on the TPS53319 with DCR injection (Vout = 1.2V)
Figure 5 shows the corresponding transient response at load step-up and step-down. I also conducted these experiments with the PMP8824.
Figure 5: Load transient response of the TPS53319 (Vout = 1.2V)
For DCAP2 and DCAP3 control systems, the DCR injection circuit is integrated inside the silicon. The same technique is applicable. Figure 6 shows the loop Bode plot test setup for DCAP2 and DCAP3 regulators.
Figure 6: Proper DCAP2 and DCAP3 regulator control-loop Bode plot measurement setup
Bode plots are measurable for DCAP, or DCAP2/DCAP3 regulators. With the technique provided in the previous discussion, Bode plots can be measured to assure system stability and to serve a guideline to optimize transient performance.
What is the value for Cpass for the TPS54295PWPR?
Can I choose 0.1uF?
Hi Shawn: It is recommended to use a bypassing capacitor ten times that of the ripple injection capacitor C, so if the capacitor used for ripple injection is 10nF, a 0.1uF capacitor should be OK. Thanks for asking!
Could you please help elaborate why we need to choose the bypassing capacitor ten times than C_ripple injection?
For traditional control architectures, do we need a Cpass?
Hello Andy: At high frequencies, the effective ripple forming capacitor is actually the Cp and Cpass in series. To simplify the design process, with Cpass much greater than Cp, the effective ripple forming capacitor is dominated by Cp.
thank you for your answers.
In actual application, usually we need to put the voltage sense point close to the load, but the inductor current ripple inject circuit need to also close to output inductor. This placement would cause the difficulty how the loop breaking point does cover the both feedback paths.
So, how to deal with this problem? look forward to your comments!
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.