It’s amazing what people will do in order to be the best. For example, athletes will train tirelessly just to shave tenths of seconds off of their race times. Students spend years studying to achieve top honors. Organizations spend decades developing technologies to solve problems that were once only written about in science fiction novels. And finally – nerd alert! – power-supply engineers dedicate themselves to creating converters that are more efficient, with higher density than any converters that came before.
Laugh if you want, but I’ll bet most of you have powered up your circuits and at least achieved personal bests in terms of power density and efficiency that had you outright excited. Maybe you went home and tried to articulate the experience to your spouse or children, only to have them look at you with complete and utter confusion, perplexed at your enthusiasm.
Rest assured, you will receive no such judgment here. Personally, I love the idea of taking something and making it better than it was before. TI has a new controller, the UCC256301, that’s generating a lot of buzz right now because it does exactly that. It takes power supplies that perform well and makes them perform awesome.
The UCC256301 is the newest LLC controller in the TI family, shown in Figure 1. Its features and benefits include integrated high-voltage startup, x-cap discharge, robust fault protection and a new control method that absolutely rocks (more on that later).
Figure 1: UCC256301 system block diagram
In the process of doing competitive analysis, the UCC256301 beats similar devices in stability margin, ease of design, robust protection mechanisms, light load efficiency and transient disturbance rejection.
By way of a practical example (and in keeping with the geeky theme of this post), I took a commercial gaming system and retrofitted it with the UCC256301. Figure 2 shows the before-and-after load transient response.
Figure 2: Transient response improvement
The performance of the original board was actually very good. But dude! Look at what the UCC256301 did to it – the load transient response is now a virtual “don’t care.” To a manufacturer, this could mean up to a 20% reduction in output capacitance, not to mention all of the other component savings from heightened performance and integration. The block diagram in Figure 3 illustrates the different system-level circuits that a device like this saves.
Figure 3: System-level component savings
In this same gaming system, I achieved additional performance enhancements on output ripple voltage during burst mode (10x smaller) and light load efficiency (as much as a 10% improvement, Figure 5). On another system, I even measured less than 40mW of no-load power while fully regulating the output in the presence of a high-voltage power-factor correction (PFC) input. In my mind, this exemplifies the concept of upping your game. I tried to tell my wife and kids about it, but got agonizing blank stares in return.
Figure 5: Ripple improvement
Figure 6: Efficiency improvement
There are many aspects of this device that I could discuss; however, at its heart is a new control architecture called hybrid hysteretic control (HHC). This control architecture combines the best elements of direct frequency-controlled LLC and charge-controlled LLC to come up with something that is better than either. In reality, it is this control method that is responsible for the bulk of the improvements.
So what’s your story? Do you use LLC converters? Do you think this controller is interesting enough that you’d like to learn more about what it can do to up your game? If you have any thoughts on this or anything else, let me know in the comments section below.
Good day Brent,
Wonderful, and thank you for the information.
It is good to read something from you again.
I am already using the UCC25600 in a power supply for an audio amplifier with exceptional good results.
I am very curious now to use the UCC256301 in my next design.
God-willing, I will immediately order some for experimentation.
Thanks Stephan, let me know what you think after you get to kick the tires on this device.
Nice work! Thanks for the Blog, training and your work with the LLC topology...
Can I use this topology for 24V DC to 1000V DC 150W !
Thanks for the comment. You certainly can, however the LLC converter really brings the most benefit to systems with high voltage inputs. If you can provide me with some additional inputs on the requirements I can put you in touch with a member of my team to help you identify the right solution for this problem.
Thank you. I want high voltage output(1000V/150mA) with high efficiency and compact size for magnetron tube inputs. Currently I am using push pull topology for the same application. I am thinking about size reduction and increasing the efficiency.
Great, can you provide me with your email address?
If so I'll have someone contact you.
Email ID: firstname.lastname@example.org
Can We use UCC256304 controller for Battery charger applications? I/p voltage 400 to 500V DC PV Panel and out put is 3KW 48V lead acid battery charger with constant current Bulk charge mode and constant voltage absorption mode.
Do we have any reference designs for Battery charger applications.
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.