In the second installment of this series, I went over the basics of the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 61000-4-2 rating for electrostatic discharge (ESD) diodes.
One comment that I frequently hear from circuit designers after an ESD failure is, “I used an ESD protection diode that was rated for 30kV contact and 30kV air-gap IEC 61000-4-2 ESD. Why did my system still fail? A 30kV/30kV rating is way above the recommended 8kV/15kV rating!”
While the IEC 61000-4-2 rating is important, it is not the only factor that you need to consider when selecting an ESD diode. The IEC 61000-4-2 rating only tells you how much voltage the ESD diode itself can withstand. The rating gives no indication of whether the downstream circuitry will be protected. To understand that, you would need to look at the clamping voltage of the diode.
A protection diode placed in parallel with the circuit protects that circuit from ESD. When an ESD strike occurs, the diode will promptly break down and steer “all” of the ESD current to ground, thus protecting the circuit downstream. I put “all” in parentheses because the only way all of the ESD current would flow through the ESD diode is if the diode had zero impedance. In the real world, all ESD diodes have some small resistance, called the dynamic resistance (RDYN). RDYN will cause a voltage drop across a conducting diode; since the protected integrated circuit (IC) is in parallel, you will see that same voltage drop across the protected IC (Figure 1). This voltage drop is known as the clamping voltage.
Figure 1: Clamping voltage of an ESD diode
The clamping voltage of an ESD diode will ultimately determine whether or not a downstream IC will be protected against ESD strikes. Although it is one of the most important specifications, it is also probably the hardest to find on a data sheet. The easiest way to determine the true clamping voltage of a diode when exposed to an IEC ESD strike is to look at the transmission line pulse (TLP) response curve. Figure 2 is an example of the ESD122 TLP response curve, which shows the device’s relationship between current and voltage. As you can see, when the current flowing through the device increases, the voltage across the device increases at an almost linear rate.
Figure 2: TLP response curve for the ESD122
The TLP is useful because it has similar characteristics to an IEC 61000-4-2 ESD strike. As a result, you can correlate TLP current with IEC ESD:
With this information, you can extrapolate from the TLP response curve in Figure 2 that the ESD122 will have a clamping voltage of ~13.5V during an 8kV IEC 61000-4-2 ESD strike. In other words, you can expect the downstream circuit to be exposed to 13.5V for approximately 100ns when an 8kV IEC strike occurs.
As a general rule, the lower the clamping voltage, the better the protection performance, so look for the TLP curve the next time you select an ESD diode.
Thanks for this great article.
But there seems to be some inaccuracy about IEC currents. I refer to 61000-4-2 and found that, a 2/4/6/8kV IEC strike should correspond to 7.5/15/22.5/30A Ipp current. Could you pls check that?
Please refer to this E2E post for an explanation on this: e2e.ti.com/.../947229
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.