Part Number: ADS4249 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: ADS4245 Hi, I would like to understand what the burnout specification for the ADS4249 is. Thank you.
Part Number: ADS4249 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: ADS4245 Hi, I would like to understand what the burnout specification of the ADS4249 is. It is not specified in the datasheet. Thanks.
Part Number: ADS4249 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMH6554 Tool/software: HI,
We use the LMH6554 to drive the ADC as Figure 1,the ADC is ADS4249. The LMH6554 converts the 10 MHz（1V VPP) single-ended signal into a differential signal and outputs it…
Part Number: ADS4249 Tool/software: Dear TI Engineer
The datasheet of the ads4249 shows that the vcm pin of the ads4249 outputs 0.95v common mode voltage,but in our circuit the voltage we measured on the VCM is 0.972V,and I want to kown the output voltage…
Part Number: ADS4249 Tool/software: We use ADS4249 to sample an 80M sinewave signal。The digital output of ADS4249 is connected to FPGA through LVDS interface.we use FPGA demodule the 80M signal.In theory,the demodulation result is a straight line.but…
Part Number: ADS4249 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: ADS4229 Tool/software: The ADCs ADS4229 and ADS4249 have ECCN 3A991.C.2 and 3A991.C.3, respectively. What exactly does this mean in practice, i.e. is there somewhere a list of countries which we won…
Part Number: ADS4249 Hi
i have Zynq board in which PL bank interface (1.8V) with ADS4249
also using PL SPI with 1.8V but still SPI is Not working with ADS4249
when we write 0th reg with 01 i can see following
but when again i try to read same…
Part Number: ADS4249 We have some conversion board with some ads4249 adc and we have seen that on some of those ads4249 after some time of work the second channel of one of those adc stop to work, or bad work, if there is a simultaneous signal on the…
Part Number: ADS4249 Hello,
My customer is testing reading and writing the ADS4249 registers on a board they designed.
Other registers are read normally with the set values.
Below, 0x4A and 0x58 both wrote 0x01, but board 1 was read as 0x41/0x01…
