Part Number: AMC1300 Hi Team,
just want to check on next gen of AMC1300 and also whether it is p2p with 1300. Application is ESS ( 400V system and 800V system). Thanks.
BRs
Given
Part Number: AMC1300 Hi Team,
Good day!
Cuold you please help if there is a tolerance for the very low input Z of 20kR?
Another question is if you hold one input (let's say VinN to dc voltage on the isolated high side) what will be the output on the non…
Part Number: AMC1300 Hi! We are using six AMC1300B ICs on our board for three pairs of voltage and current measurement channels. Please find the schematics for each of the circuits attached. We seem to be having two issues:
1) There are three current channels…
Part Number: AMC1300 Hi expert,
In AMC1300 datasheet, there is a description: "If a four-pin shunt is used, the device inputs are connected to the inner leads, and GND1 is connected to one of the outer leads of the shunt."
My customer want to…
Part Number: AMC1300 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: AMC3301 , AMC3302 , AMC1302 Dear team,
The customer would like to consider using AMC1300 for their application like below.
Is the AMC1300 available to sense AC line current with shunt? Is there any problem…
Part Number: AMC1300 Dear Sir Madam
Do you have a Spice-Model for the AMC1300 available (Not only a TINA-Model since I use another Tool than TINA)?
Br, Samuel
Part Number: AMC1300 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: AMC3301 , AMC1350 , AMC3330 , AMC1311 Hi,
I modified the TINA simulation of the AMC1300 for voltage measurement. We wanted to see if the spice model shows any change in performance with splitting the…
Part Number: AMC1300 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: STRIKE , , TPD1E10B06 , AMC1311 , AMC3330 , AMC1350 Hi, For last month I've been working on isolated amplifiers. Now I'm trying to design proper input protection. The " Absolute Maximum Ratings" section…
Part Number: AMC1300 Please, take a look at the attached draft. I'm using three AMC1300 isolated amplifiers in the showed three-channel voltage measurement circuit, with one unique common reference node.
Do you see any problem with that? Note that…