Part Number: AWR6843 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: , IWR6843 Hello Expert
We are developing 60G Radar with AWR6843. Compare to the demo board AWR6843ISK, the antenna design is different. Then we change the configuration with the demo , but the cloud…
Part Number: AWR6843 Could I get some TI sales contact to discuss the secure variant of the AWR6843? We may have a NDA already in place but that would have been setup by a former colleague.
Part Number: AWR6843 Greetings, First, some general information:
We are using AWR6843.
We are using mmwave SDK 03_04_00_02.
We are not using any later version of mmwave SDK because this was the latest version available when our product concerned…
Part Number: AWR6843 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC2674P10 , , SYSBIOS Tool/software: I followed the instruction .
On my side CCS12.8 unable to connect to some service: “ROV _connect failed to start agent: Provided value for cloudAgentInstallerServerURL…
Part Number: AWR6843 Hello!
Our company is currently using the TI6843ISK development board, with the demo located at:
C:\ti\radar_toolbox_4_00_00_05\source\ti\examples\Industrial_and_Personal_Electronics\People_Tracking
In the dss, within radarProcess…
Part Number: AWR6843 Tool/software: Hi
I encountered an issue while attempting to log data by connecting the custom board to the DCA1000.
I checked the question below.
AWRL6432: Interface with DCA1000 for raw data capture - Sensors forum - Sensors…
Part Number: AWR6843 We operate at a low sampling rate of 3MHz for a sweep of 3.15GHz for inside a vehicle. The 350kHz cut-off is at 1.4m. We are concerned this will introduce un-wanted Rx losses (degraded noise figure) and potentially phase and amplitude…
Part Number: AWR6843 Dear TI Support,
We are currently using the device AWR6843AQGABLRQ1 (Q1 production device) in production.
While reviewing the public TI document “AWR6843 Device Silicon Errata – Silicon Revision 2.0”, we observed that all MSS…
Part Number: AWR6843 Tool/software: Hi
About the power-on sequence of AWR6843, do all external voltage rails need to obey the following figure completely, or just all external voltage rails are stable before reset is de-asserted ?
Thanks…