Part Number: AM67A Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SYSCONFIG Tool/software: Hi,
I design a custom board using AM67A based on BY-AI. I am trying to bring-up with a Linux image and u-boot of BY-AI that is currently working.
The difference between the two…
Hi Fabiana,
Thanks a lot for testing. It's good to know that higher resolutions are possible and that there should not really be a limit.
Our maximum resolution is 2464x2064.
We also see the same problem when using a BeagleY-AI board.
However, I…
Part Number: AM6442 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: BEAGLEY-AI
Tool/software:
Dear TI team,
we've encountered a rather serious bug in the AM64x' PCIe implementation regarding flow-control for PTM messages.
We've got a setup consisting of a custom…
Part Number: AM67A Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DRA821 , , BEAGLEY-AI Tool/software: TI's HW device like the DRA821 usually supports Die-Registers to have 4 unique 32-bits numbers for each device like CTRLMMR_WKUP_DIE_ID0, CTRLMMR_WKUP_DIE_ID1, CTRLMMR_WKUP_DIE_ID2…
Hello,
The AM67A SDK and J722S SDKs , which include Linux, RTOS and QNX, are all meant for the same device . The differences between these SDKs are outlined in the pages linked. These SDKs can be used for BeagleY-AI but keep in mind that we have only validated…
Hi Jason,
It appears that the issue is somewhere within the firmware.
I compared the following two images:
Image
DSS Clock Speed
Kernel tag
BeagleY-AI Debian XFCE 12.5 2024-03-25
150MHz
6.1.80-ti-arm64-r54
BeagleY-AI Debian 12.7 2024-09-04 XFC…
Part Number: AM67 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: BEAGLEY-AI ,
Tool/software:
Trying to build a Yocto image for the beagley-ai / am67xx/j722 and the conf is missing from meta-ti kirkstone and scarthgap. Does this imply the SoC is no longer going to be…
Hi Sathiya,
There is a reference board made by our partner for a different (but same family) of processors as TDA4VM, and they use micro HDMI: https://openbeagle.org/beagley-ai/beagley-ai/-/blob/main/BeagleY-AI_SCH.pdf?ref_type=heads . I think this schematic…
Hi Evan,
I am not sure how to output to card2 instead of card1, nor did the person I consult know how to modify for card2. I will need to ask around some more.
However, as an alternative, my colleague had moved the LVDS output to be on the same dss instance…