Part Number: CC110L Tool/software: Hi, I have configured CC110L such that it is in continuous RX state. RX after RX and RX after TX. MCSM1 configuration 0x0F. All TX is happening synchronously in the system and since CC110L is always in RX , RX is asynchronous…
Part Number: CC110L Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC1190 , CC1101 Tool/software: Hi,
We are using the CC1190 Front End with CC110L. For CC1190 in HGM mode rssi offset value is given as 81 (38.4kBaud , 868 MHz).
my question is, what will be the…
Part Number: CC110L I'm having trouble to detect the sync word (0x1234) with CC110L. My application is 434MHz of center freq. 20kHz of deviation, 162kHz of Rx filter BW, 2.4k baud rate, fixed packet lenght of 8 bytes, 200kHz of channel spacing and using…
Part Number: CC110L Tool/software: Hello,
I'm working on migrating an old 869 MHz transmitter based on the ATA8403C TX chip to a CC110L-based design.
The ATA8403C uses a rectangular loop antenna, like this:
Loop dimensions: 18 x 13 mm.
As the…
Part Number: CC110L Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC1101 , CC1120 Tool/software: Hi,
in the datasheet of CC110L, the sensitivity criteria is under PER. with PER, it should be under a specific packet Length.
other CC part used BER.
could you please…
Part Number: CC110L Tool/software: I would like to inform you that we are planning to utilize a miniature PCB Helical Antenna ( 868 MHz) in our Smart Metering NIC Card.
Brief Description of our use case as mentioned below :
We will utilize…
Part Number: CC110L Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC1101 Tool/software: I want to use Carrier Sense in CC110L.
How to generate similar dBm CS threshold table for, MAGN_TARGET=3(33dB) at 38.4KBaud , 865MHz.
Part Number: CC110L Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC1190 , CC1101 , RF-RANGE-ESTIMATOR , CC-ANTENNA-DK2 Tool/software: Hello Tech team,
I am working on my company's patented project where an airline passenger needs to track his check-in Suitcase…
Part Number: CC110L Tool/software: Hello, Figure 9 in Design Note DN038 shows the coordinates correlation to CTIA OTA Reports. We interpret that figure as followed. Is that right?
Best regards
Janis