Part Number: CC110L Tool/software: Hi, I have configured CC110L such that it is in continuous RX state. RX after RX and RX after TX. MCSM1 configuration 0x0F. All TX is happening synchronously in the system and since CC110L is always in RX , RX is asynchronous…
Part Number: CC110L Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC1190 , CC1101 Tool/software: Hi,
We are using the CC1190 Front End with CC110L. For CC1190 in HGM mode rssi offset value is given as 81 (38.4kBaud , 868 MHz).
my question is, what will be the rssi offset…
Part Number: CC110L Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC1101 Tool/software: The datasheet: https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/cc110l.pdf?ts=1738262860168&ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.ti.com%252Fproduct%252FCC110L
no package-drawing
The package-sheet…
Part Number: CC110L Tool/software: Hello,
I am currently working with a client who is interested in developing their own automotive key fobs. After evaluating various options, we have decided to move forward with the CC110L transceiver for the RF communication…
Hi Paul,
Please see the response here: https://e2e.ti.com/support/wireless-connectivity/sub-1-ghz-group/sub-1-ghz/f/sub-1-ghz-forum/1368521/cc110l-carrier-sense
You would need to perform some measurements to get the exact values or use the tables described…
Hi,
Please create a new thread for the additional questions about the antenna (you can link this thread as part of its creation) as it makes it both easier to track (for TI) and also for other forum users who may have similar questions as those discussed…
Part Number: CC110L Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC-ANTENNA-DK2 Tool/software: Hello,
We are currently in the process of developing a solution that requires a reliable PCB antenna for communication in the 865 MHz to 868 MHz frequency range.
To meet…
Hi Paul,
Please see Sverre's answer in the following thread (the last paragraph describes how to measure the exact threshold): https://e2e.ti.com/support/wireless-connectivity/other-wireless-group/other-wireless/f/other-wireless-technologies-forum…
There are always some layout parasitics that can effect the exact component values. If 5.6 nH is providing a notch at 688 MHz then recommend to use this value.
