Part Number: TIDA-010024 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC1310 , CC1350 , CC2620 , CC2630 , CC2640 , CC2650 , CC1352P , CC2652P Hi Team,
Good day. I am posting this inquiry on behalf of our customer.
This problem occurs when I compile TIDA…
>> Just curious: Why the interest in CC2620?
I am working with CC2420-device since 2008 and the CC2620 would be its closely related predecessor.
Generally I am evaluation a possible configuration (sub 1GHz vs. 2.4GHz; SoC vs. MCU and modem; 802.15.4…
Hi Torbjorn,
Will increasing the pairing table size increase the max discovery results?
We are using the CC2533F96, but we're not in a position to change to cc2620
Thanks,
Red
Part Number: REMOTI Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC2620 , CC2650RC , CC2650 , , CC2531 Tool/software: Code Composer Studio Dear Friends,
My objective is to develop wireless data logging using low energy zigbee mesh network.
I believe that CC2620…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC2650 , CC2640 , CC2630 , CC2620 Hi team,
In what use cases would we use the CC2650 over the CC2640, CC2630, or CC2620? I understand the CC2650 is our multi protocol MCU that can be used for development purposes and…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: REMOTI , CC2650 , CC2620 I am happy to announce that RemoTI v2.0 is now available!
RemoTI™ 2.0 (Supports CC2620 and CC2650)
RemoTI™ 2.0 supports the backwards compatible ZRC 2.0 (ZigBee Remote Control) profile. …
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC2620 , CC2630 , CC2650 , CC2640 Hi All,
I am trying to design a microcontroller platform that works on IEEE 802.15.4 and I want to port contiki to the platform. I am getting confused in deciding among the CC26xx family…
Part Number: TMS320F28335 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC1350 , CC1310 , CC2538 , CC2650 , CC2640 , CC2630 , CC2620 , CC3200 Tool/software: Code Composer Studio I have been using CCS7 on my Mac with the TMS320 family of microcontrollers. I just noticed…
Part Number: CC2650 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC2640 , CC2630 , , CC1350 , CC2620 , CC1310 Introduction
This article gives an overview of the available tools for designing a production test for a product by exercising the CC1310/CC1350 or CC2620…
So, the CC2620 and CC2630 do not allow to define an own package formats as specified in subsection 27.3.1. Further, they do not allow to use the commands as specified in subsection 27.3.2. Is this correct?
In the schematics >> CC2650EM-MurBal << TI…
