Hi Gareth,
Those power stages have 30V voltage rating, so power loss might be slightly higher, but should be OK to use. If heavy load efficiency/thermal is concern then CSD97374 is better with higher current rating.
Part Number: CSD95379Q3M I want to configure an inverter circuit using CSD95379Q3M. I checked the data sheet of CSD95379Q3M and decided that if the PWM signal could be input properly from the outside, one CSD95379Q3M could be used to configure a half-bridge…
Part Number: CSD95379Q3M Hi Team,
We've been trying to use the SYNC-BUCK-FET-LOSS-CALC to calculate the losses of CSD95379Q3M.
It seems like every time I press any of the '--> --> CLICK HERE <-- <--' buttons a new selection windows starts to open but…
Part Number: CSD95379Q3M Hi,
I plan to use this part for a low frequency switching application where the main losses will be determined by FET conduction, but the datasheet does not show the FET Rds-on values.
Using the the TINA model for the part I have…
Part Number: CSD95379Q3M
I have made a full bridge using 2 of the mentioned CSD95379Q3MT part. The plan is to connect to ground at one side. Use PWM on the other side to generate a sine wave. Then reverse for alternating voltage.
This appeared to be…
Part Number: CSD95379Q3M Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS53625 , TPS53647 , TPS53622A Hi
I just started design of TPS53625 power supply and came to notice that it needed output power stage MOSFET, why is this needed.
My requirement is Vout: 2.3V and…
Part Number: CSD95379Q3M Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN74LVC2G126 , CSD Hi,
I'm planning to incorporate CSD95379Q3M in a half bridge push pull design (a half bridge on primary side, and output without inductor). This design has intrinsic ZVS behavior…