Part Number: DLPC410 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DLP9500 , , DLP650LNIR , DLPA200 Tool/software: Hi, TI expert:
I use my own board design, the hardware architecture is FPGA+DLPC410+DLP9500。
We have adopted a new approach by flashing the firmware…
Part Number: DLPA300 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DLPA200 , The datasheet does not specify thermal pin dimension and recommended stencil. Our PCB manufacturer said 10x10mm thermal pad with 60% stencil coverage is too big for the thermal pin it will…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DLPA200 , DLP650LNIR , DLPLCRC410EVM , DLPC410 , DLP650NE , DLPLCR65NEVM As a follow up: I found the DLP650LNIRFYL for NIR. Does the DLP650LNIRFYL require an external driver?
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DLPA200 DAD1000
2BCJS3T
2503253-6
g4
Dear, good morning.
I would like to know if there are 4 units of this component available for purchase, can you guide me?
Part Number: DLP9500 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DLPA200 , Hello,
According to DLPA200 datasheet, TI recommends "Coilcraft DT1608C-223" as an Inductor for VRESET_SWL. However, the parts has already been EOL. Would you please tell me a substitute…
Part Number: DLPC150 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DLPA200 , DLP2010NIR , CCSTUDIO , DLPNIRNANOEVM , DLPDLCR230NPEVM We're beginning to design a system using DMDs for spectroscopy. The DLP2010NIR, DLPC150, and DLPA200/DLPA 2005, from my research, seem…
Part Number: DLP9500 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DLPA200 Hello,
Each schematics assigns zenner diode as below. However, the comment says both assignment is not correct. Can we remove D8 on DLPA side or D1 on DMD side?
Hi Xinyu,
The devices have different array sizes, form factors (sizes) and performance specifications.
In general, the smaller devices are for mobile or small footprint types of products, and the larger ones for more industrial or higher performance…
Frank,
You are correct. I should have made it clear that if you do run at 70 kHz it will be outside the rating of the DLPA200. What I was attempting to communicate is that it is still far below the 32*16 kHz = 512 kHz that you were inquiring about.…
